Cases 1 - 10 of 17
James v. Wal-Mart Store East, L.P. et al
as 1:2020cv01090
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Store, East, L.P., Retail Trust, John Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Mary James
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
MARTIN et al v. WAL-MART STORES, INC.
as 1:2019cv08836
Defendant:
WAL-MART STORES, INC., SAM and WAL-MART CORPORATION
Plaintiff:
BRIAN MARTIN and CAROL MARTIN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Neswood v. Sam's East, Inc.
as 1:2016cv01153
Plaintiff:
Irene Neswood
Defendant:
Sam's East, Inc. , Sam's Club Corporation and Wal-Mart Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 16-1625
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Nowden v. Wal-Mart Corporate Office
as 4:2016cv00092
Plaintiff:
Sharon Nowden
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Corporate Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
YANCEY et al v. WAL-MART CORPORATION et al
as 3:2015cv06646
Plaintiff:
CARLTON YANCEY and LETICIA YANCEY
Defendant:
WAL-MART CORPORATION and JOHN DOES 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Personal Injury
LAFONTAINE v. WAL-MART CORPORATE et al
as 1:2012cv07291
Plaintiff:
NICOLE LAFONTAINE
Defendant:
WAL-MART CORPORATE , WAL-MART STORE #2108 , ABC CORPORATION 1-5 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
SAGE v. WAL-MART STORE #2108 et al
as 1:2012cv02523
Plaintiff:
JOAN I. SAGE
Defendant:
WAL-MART STORE #2108 , WAL-MART CORPORATION , JOHN DOE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jacinto v. Wal-Mart Corporation
as 8:2011cv01056
Plaintiff:
Hope Jacinto
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Dodge et al v. Wal-Mart Corporation et al
as 1:2011cv00030
Plaintiff:
Sharon N. Dodge and Calvin Dodge
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Corporation , Unknown Party and Action Property Service, LLC
Mediator:
Facilitative Mediator
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
