Cases 21 - 27 of 27
Mahaffey et al v. Takeda Pharmaceuticals America Inc et al
as 6:2015cv02206
Plaintiff:
Wayne Mahaffey
Defendant:
Takeda Pharmaceuticals America Inc , Takeda Pharmaceuticals U S A Inc and Takeda Pharmaceutical Co Ltd
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Mahaffey et al v. TAKEDA PHARMACEUTICALS AMERICA, INC. et al
as 9:2015cv00116
Plaintiff:
Wayne Mahaffey , Alvin Allen , Dorothy Barnes and others
Defendant:
TAKEDA PHARMACEUTICALS AMERICA, INC. , Takeda Pharmaceuticals U.S.A., Inc. and Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Mahaffey et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2015cv03588
Plaintiff:
Heather Mahaffey and Scott Mahaffey
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hermosillo et al v. McKesson Corporation et al
as 3:2013cv03169
Plaintiff:
Gil Hermosillo , Elaine Jackson , Patrick Kennedy and others
Defendant:
McKesson Corporation and SmithKline Beecham Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Mahaffey et al v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv16624
Plaintiff:
Christa Mahaffey and Townes Mahaffey
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc. and Sofradim Production SAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Aaron et al v. Smithkline Beecham Corporation
as 3:2009cv01071
Plaintiff:
Sarah Aaron, Kimberly Adams, Betty Alberts and others
Defendant:
SmithKline Beecham Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Product Liability
MAHAFFEY v. BALLY'S PARK PLACE, INC. et al
as 1:2009cv01873
Plaintiff:
ART MAHAFFEY
Defendant:
BALLY'S PARK PLACE, INC., GASSER CHAIR COMPANY, INC., ABC CORPORATIONS 1-10 and others
Cross Claimant:
BALLY'S PARK PLACE, INC. and BALLY'S PARK PLACE, INC.
Cross Defendant:
GASSER CHAIR COMPANY, INC. and GASSER CHAIR COMPANY, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
