Cases 51 - 60 of 94
Tisi v. Lowe's Home Improvement Centers, LLC et al
as 6:2014cv00399
Plaintiff:
Mary Tisi
Defendant:
Lowe's Home Improvement Centers, LLC , Whirlpool Corporation and Maytag Sales, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
PAYNE et al v. WHIRLPOOL CORPORATION
as 1:2014cv00062
Plaintiff:
JANE WALKER PAYNE and CINCINNATI INSURANCE COMPANY, THE
Defendant:
WHIRLPOOL CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
O'Neil v. Whirlpool Corporation et al
as 3:2013cv03172
Plaintiff:
Aaron O'Neill
Defendant:
Whirlpool Corporation and Does 1 through 100, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Finker et al v. Whirlpool Corporation
as 3:2013cv01154
Plaintiff:
Lazar S. Finker and Raissa M. Frenkel
Defendant:
Whirlpool Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Mid Century Insurance Company v. Whirlpool Corporation et al
as 8:2013cv01335
Defendant:
Does and Whirlpool Corporation
Plaintiff:
Mid Century Insurance Company
McMahan et al v. Rheem Manufacturing Company et al
as 2:2013cv00046
Plaintiff:
Justin McMahan and Danielle Bissell
Defendant:
Rheem Manufacturing Company, Emerson Climate Technologies Incorporated, RegO Goddard Products / ECI and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
State Farm General Insurance Company v. Whirlpool Corporation et al
as 2:2013cv04288
Defendant:
Does and Whirlpool Corporation
Plaintiff:
State Farm General Insurance Company
Atkinson et al v. Whirlpool Corporation, Inc.
as 1:2013cv01851
Plaintiff:
Yuri C. Atkinson and Daniel Keith Atkinson
Defendant:
Whirlpool Corporation, Inc.
Kristian Apodaca v. Whirlpool Corporation
as 8:2013cv00725
Plaintiff:
Kristian Apodaca
Defendant:
Whirlpool Corporation
Interinsurance Exchange of the Automobile Club v. Whirlpool Corporation et al
as 8:2013cv00634
Defendant:
Does and Whirlpool Corporation
Plaintiff:
Interinsurance Exchange of the Automobile Club
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
