Cases 1 - 10 of 681
Lewis Williams, III v. Smith & Nephew, Inc.
as 24-1090
Plaintiff:
LEWIS WILLIAMS, III, CRYSTAL WILLIAMS and MICHAEL STELMACK, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Lewis Williams, Jr. and the Estate of Angela Williams
Defendant:
SMITH & NEPHEW, INC.
Rasulallah v. Smith & Nephew Inc et al
as 4:2023cv00015
Plaintiff:
Barbara Rasulallah
Defendant:
Smith & Nephew Inc and John Does
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Product Liability
Langolf et al v. Smith & Nephew, Inc.
as 1:2022cv03196
Plaintiff:
Charles Langolf and Theresa Langolf
Defendant:
Smith & Nephew, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Tesche v. Smith & Nephew, Inc.
as 1:2022cv02714
Plaintiff:
Daniel Tesche
Defendant:
Smith & Nephew Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Tesche v. Smith & Nephew, Inc.
as 2:2022cv01776
Plaintiff:
Daniel Tesche
Defendant:
Smith & Nephew, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Zapf et al v. Smith & Nephew, Inc.
as 1:2022cv02066
Plaintiff:
Wesley Zapf and Janeen Zapf
Defendant:
Smith & Nephew, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Guzman v. Smith & Nephew, Inc.
as 1:2022cv01136
Plaintiff:
Bobbi Guzman
Defendant:
Smith & Nephew, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Mellgren v. Smith & Nephew, Inc.
as 1:2022cv01078
Defendant:
Deborah Mellgren and Smith & Nephew, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Tyler v. Smith & Nephew, Inc.
as 1:2022cv00764
Plaintiff:
Harold Tyler
Defendant:
Smith & Nephew, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Chabot v. Smith & Nephew, Inc.
as 1:2022cv00402
Plaintiff:
Joyce L. Chabot
Defendant:
Smith & Nephew, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
