Cases 1 - 10 of 12,448
Talarczyk et al v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation et al
as 8:2022cv00836
Plaintiff:
FRANCIS TALARCZYK and WANDA ALGARIN TALARCZYK
Defendant:
Air & Liquid Systems Corporation, ALFA LAVAL INC., THE DELAVAL SEPARATOR COMPANY and others
Not Classified By Court:
Jonathan C. Hollinshead
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
Knox et al v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation as successor by merger to Buffalo Pumps, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv11695
Plaintiff:
Thomas Knox, Rosemarie Knox and Bayer Cropscience Inc., Successor in interest to Amchem Products, Inc.
Defendant:
Air & Liquid Systems Corporation as successor by merger to Buffalo Pumps, Inc., Alliance Laundry Systems LLC Individually and as successor-in-interest to American Laundry Machinery Co., Armstrong International, Inc. and others
Cross Defendant:
Columbia Boiler Company, Crane Co., Crosby Valve, LLC and others
Cross Claimant:
General Electric Company
Interested Party:
Defendants Liaison Counsel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
David Martincic, et al v. AO Smith Corp, et al
as 20-3068
Defendant / Appellee:
AURORA PUMPS, SAUER INC, SWINDELL-DRESSLER INTERNATIONAL CO and others
Defendant:
BMI REFRACTORY SERVICES INC, SULZER PUMPS SOLUTIONS INC, FKA Ahlstrom Pumps LLC, EICHLEAY CORP and others
Defendant / Appellant:
FOSTER WHEELER LLC
Plaintiff / Appellee:
MERL WILLIAMS, His Husband and DAVID P. MARTINCIC
Cupp v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation, as Successor by Merger to Buffalo Pumps, Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv10168
Defendant:
Union Carbide Corporation, BW/IP, Inc., Warren Pumps LLC and others
Cross Claimant:
Crane Co., Carrier Corporation, CBS Corporation and others
Cross Defendant:
Ericsson, Inc., Industrial Holdings Corporation, Armstrong International, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Gail Cupp, James Cupp, Jason Cupp and others
Not Classified By Court:
Robert B. Collings, Edward F. Harrington and Judge Donald L Cabell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Asbestos Litigation
Asbestos Action - Refiled as case no. 1:16cv10000
as 1:2016cv01922
Defendant:
Honeywell International, Inc., Riley Power, Inc., Westinghouse Electric Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
Larry L. Lenk and Sandra J. Lenk
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Lenk et al v. A.W. Chesterton Company et al
as 1:2016cv10000
Plaintiff:
Lenk, Larry L. Lenk and Sandra J. Lenk
Defendant:
A.W. Chesterton Company, CBS Corporation, Ferro Engineering Division of ON Marine Services Company and others
Cross Defendant:
Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
James G. Burney, et al v. A-C Product Liability Trust, et al
as 16-3392
:
In re: NORTHERN OHIO MARITIME ASBESTOS LITIGATION
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLARD E. BARTEL and DAVID C. PEBBLES
Plaintiff:
JAMES G. BURNEY and CREIGHTON E. MILLER
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST, ACANDS, INC., ACORN IRON & SUPPLY CO. and others
Defendant - Appellee:
SOCONY MOBIL OIL CO., MOBIL OIL CORPORATION, EXXON MOBIL CORPORATION and others
Kelleher v. Boeing Company, et al
as 3:2015cv00893
Defendant:
Beazer East, Inc., CBS Corporation, Industrial Holdings Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
Thomas Kelleher
Cross Defendant:
Sprinkmann Insulation Inc., United Technologies Corporation and Rohr Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Maclachlan et al v. General Electric Company et al
as 1:2015cv10001
Defendant:
BMI Refractory Services, Inc., Georgia-Pacific LLC, General Electric Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
Donald Maclachlan and Pat Maclachlan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Newcomb et al v. General Electric Company et al
as 1:2014cv00509
Plaintiff:
Edward Newcomb and Jeanine Newcomb
Defendant:
General Electric Company , Ingersoll Rand Company , Foster Wheeler Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
