Cases 81 - 90 of 92
Rena Swanson v. Rhonda Wilson, et al
as 10-5064
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RENA PURINTUN SWANSON
Defendant - Appellee:
RHONDA RENEE PURINTUN WILSON, KIM LANE WILSON and CAPITOL INDEMNITY CORPORATION
Oliver et al v. Bayer CropScience LP et al
as 4:2009cv01569
Plaintiff:
Lane Oliver, Lane Oliver, Lane Oliver Farms Inc and others
Defendant:
Bayer CropScience LP, Bayer CropScience Holding Inc, Bayer Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Oliver et al v. Bayer CropScience LP et al
as 4:2009cv00677
Defendant:
Bayer CropScience LP, Bayer CropScience Holding Inc, Bayer Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
Tommy Ray Oliver Farms, David Underwood, David Underwood Farms and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lane v. Jacobs Motorsports, Ltd. et al
as 3:2009cv00447
Plaintiff:
Richard Lane
Defendant:
Jacobs Motorsports, Ltd. and Michael A. Jacobs
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Laning et al v. Hume Bank et al
as 4:2008cv00932
Plaintiff:
Lacy Laning and Brad Laning
Defendant:
Hume Bank and Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Laning et al v. Hume Bank et al
as 4:2008cv00929
Plaintiff:
Rick Laning and Wyma Laning
Defendant:
Hume Bank and Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Murphy v. Oginskis et al
as 2:2008cv13838
Plaintiff:
LeKendrick Lawun Murphy
Defendant:
Rokas Eliyahu Oginskis and Molly Lane Oginskis
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Lowis v. Virden et al
as 1:2008cv00376
Plaintiff:
Lee Lowis
Defendant:
Jason Virden and Mark B Lane
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2008cv00138
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Lowis v. Virden et al
as 2:2007cv14681
Plaintiff:
Lee Lowis
Defendant:
Jason Virden, Mark B Lane, Richard L Poole and others
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
