Cases 1 - 10 of 10
PORWAL v. PNC BANK, N.A. et al
as 2:2024cv00887
Plaintiff:
Praful Porwal
Defendant:
PNC BANK, N.A., PNC BANCORP, INC., PNC FINANCIAL SERVICES GROUP, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601 Truth in Lending
Ball v. PNC Bank, N.A.
as 1:2023cv01320
Plaintiff:
Susan R. Ball
Defendant:
PNC Bank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1444 Petition for Removal- Foreclosure
Covel et al v. PNC Bank N.A. et al
as 5:2019cv02030
Defendant:
U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, PNC Bank N.A., John Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Samar Covel and Jason Covel
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601
King v. PNC Bank N.A. et al
as 1:2017cv09052
Plaintiff:
Matthew King
Defendant:
PNC Bank N.A., Century 21 S.G.R. Inc., Sheriff of Cook County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Agustin v. PNC Financial Services Group, Inc.(The)
as 1:2017cv00525
Plaintiff:
Annette Agustin
Defendant:
PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. (The), PNC Bank N.A. and PNC Mortgage
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
King et al v. PNC Bank N.A.
as 1:2017cv03368
Plaintiff:
Matthew King and Sarah King
Defendant:
PNC Bank N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DAVIDSON v. PNC BANK, N.A.
as 1:2016cv00569
Plaintiff:
SHARON L. DAVIDSON
Defendant:
PNC BANK, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601 Truth in Lending
Verzillo et al v. PNC Bank, N.A.
as 1:2014cv04096
Plaintiff:
Joseph Verzillo and Maria Verzillo
Defendant:
PNC Bank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601
DAVINER v. PNC BANK, N.A.
as 4:2014cv00028
Plaintiff:
MIA JONES DAVINER
Defendant:
PNC BANK, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601 Truth in Lending
Moore v. National City Mortgage Company et al
as 2:2012cv01939
Plaintiff:
Kevin Moore
Defendant:
National City Mortgage Company, Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation, Mortgage Electronic Registration System and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601 Truth in Lending
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
