Antitrust Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 39
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al v. GOOGLE LLC We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2020cv03010
Plaintiff: STATE OF ARKANSAS, STATE OF LOUISIANA, STATE OF FLORIDA and others
Defendant: GOOGLE LLC
Not Classified By Court: STATE OF MICHIGAN and STATE OF CALIFORNIA
3Rd Party Defendant: NBCUNIVERSAL MEDIA, LLC, COMCAST CORPORATION and SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC.
Petitioner: AMAZON.COM, INC., APPLE INC., DUCK DUCK GO, INC. and others
Respondent: BOOKING HOLDINGS INC. and YELP INC.
Interested Party: STATE OF WASHINGTON
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Connecticut et al v. Sandoz, Inc. et al
as 3:2020cv00802
Defendant: Amneal Pharmaceuticals, LLC, Mallinckrodt PLC, Pfizer, Inc. and others
Plaintiff: State of New Mexico, State of Missouri, State of Washington and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Connecticut et al v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc.
as 2:2019cv02407
Plaintiff: State of North Dakota, State of North Carolina, State of Minnesota and others
Defendant: ACTAVIS PHARMA, INC., Richard Rogerson, WOCKHARDT USA LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
In re HIV Antitrust Litigation We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2019cv02573
Plaintiff: Peter Staley, Fraternal Order of Police, Fort Lauderdale Lodge 31, Insurance Trust Fund, Gregg S. Gonsalves, PhD and others
Defendant: Johnson & Johnson Inc., E. R. Squibb & Sons, LLC, Bristol-Myers Squibb Company and others
Amicus Curiae: HIV Organizations and Federal Trade Commission
Respondent: State of New Mexico ex rel. Hector H. Balderas, New Mexico Attorney General
Petitioner: Jacksonville Police Officers and Fire Fighters Health Insurance Trust and John F Cogan
Interested Party: Designating non-party Aurobindo USA, Inc., Zydus Pharmaceuticals (USA) Inc. and Strides Pharma, Inc.
Not Classified By Court: Amneal Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc. and Cipla USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Connecticut et al v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. Featured Case
as 3:2019cv00710
Plaintiff: State of North Dakota, State of North Carolina, State of Minnesota and others
Defendant: Actavis Pharma, Inc., Richard Rogerson, Nisha Patel and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
STATE OF ARKANSAS et al v. AUROBINDO PHARMA USA, INC. et al
as 2:2017cv03769
Plaintiff: STATE OF ARKANSAS , DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA , STATE OF MISSOURI and others
Defendant: AUROBINDO PHARMA USA, INC., CITRON PHARMA, LLC, HERITAGE PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
STATE OF CONNECTICUT et al v. AUROBINDO PHARMA USA, INC. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2017cv03768
Plaintiff: STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA, STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, STATE OF MINNESOTA and others
Defendant: EMCURE PHARMACEUTICALS, LTD., ACTAVIS PHARMA, INC., LANNETT COMPANY, INC. and others
In Re: STATE ATTORNEYS GENERAL LITIGATION
Respondent: STATE ATTORNEYS GENERAL PLAINTIFFS
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Arkansas et al v. Aurobindo Pharma USA, Inc. et al
as 3:2017cv01180
Plaintiff: State of Arkansas , District of Columbia , State of Missouri and others
Defendant: Aurobindo Pharma USA, Inc., Citron Pharma, LLC, Heritage Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
STATE OF WISCONSIN et al v. INDIVIOR INC. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2016cv05073
Plaintiff: STATE OF WISCONSIN , STATE OF ALABAMA , STATE OF ALASKA and others
Defendant: INDIVIOR INC. , RECKITTBENCHISER HEALTHCARE (UK) LTD. , INDIVIOR PLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
STATE OF NEW YORK et al v. CEPHALON, INC. et al
as 2:2016cv04234
Plaintiff: STATE OF NEW YORK , STATE OF OHIO , STATE OF VERMONT and others
Defendant: CEPHALON, INC., TEVA PHARMACEUTICALS INDUSTRIES, LTD., TEVA PHARMACEUTICALS USA, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?