Cases 21 - 30 of 253
Pizzabov, Inc. et. al. v. Visa International Service Association et. al.
as 2:2020cv01517
Defendant:
Capital One Bank, (USA), N.A., Bank of America Corp., Visa International Service Assocation and others
Plaintiff:
1SaleADay, Octagon Commerce, LLC, East New York Kosler, Corp. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 25 Clayton Act
National Association of Convenience Stores et al v. Visa U.S.A., Inc. et al
as 1:2005cv04521
Special Master:
James Orenstein
Plaintiff:
National Association of Convenience Stores, National Association of Chain Drug Stores, National Community Pharmacists Association and others
Defendant:
Visa U.S.A., Inc., Visa International Service Association, Mastercard Incorporated and others
Amicus Curiae:
U.S. Public Research Interest Group
Not Classified By Court:
1001 Property Solutions LLC, Temple Eagle Partners LLC, Fiesta Restaurant Group, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Doctors Hospital v. Cigarroa
as 23-50398
Defendant / Appellee:
Dr. Ricardo Cigarroa, Cigarroa Heart and Vascular Institute and Laredo Texas Hospital Company, L.P., doing business as Laredo Medical Center
Appellant:
University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, Dr. William Henrich, In his official capacity and Dr. Allen Anderson, in his official capacity
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al v. GOOGLE LLC
as 1:2020cv03010
Plaintiff:
STATE OF ARKANSAS, STATE OF LOUISIANA, STATE OF FLORIDA and others
Defendant:
GOOGLE LLC
Not Classified By Court:
STATE OF MICHIGAN and STATE OF CALIFORNIA
3Rd Party Defendant:
NBCUNIVERSAL MEDIA, LLC, COMCAST CORPORATION and SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC.
Petitioner:
AMAZON.COM, INC., APPLE INC., DUCK DUCK GO, INC. and others
Respondent:
BOOKING HOLDINGS INC. and YELP INC.
Interested Party:
STATE OF WASHINGTON
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
AIM Media Texas Operating, LLC v. Google, LLC et al
as 1:2021cv06888
Plaintiff:
AIM MEDIA TEXAS OPERATING, LLC
Defendant:
Google LLC and Facebook Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation (Monopolizing Trade)
Perez, III et al v. Deposition Solutions, LLC
as 1:2023cv00421
Plaintiff:
Pascal Perez, III, Austin Legal Video, LLC, Depo-Notes, LLC and others
Defendant:
Deposition Solutions, LLC d/b/a Lexitas, Court Reporters Clearinghouse, Inc., Alderson Reporting Company, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
JetBlue Airways Corporation et al v. Anthem Inc et al
as 2:2022cv00558
Plaintiff:
JetBlue Airways Corporation, JetBlue Airways Group Health Insurance Plan, Kraft Heinz Company, The and others
Defendant:
Anthem Inc formerly doing business as WELLPOINT INC, Blue Cross of California, Blue Cross of Southern California, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15 Antitrust Litigation
Bed Bath & Beyond Inc. et al v. Anthem Inc et al
as 2:2022cv01256
Plaintiff:
Bed Bath & Beyond Inc., Automobile Club of Southern California, Darling Ingredients Inc and others
Defendant:
Anthem Inc d/b/a ANthem Blue Cross LIfe and Health Insurance Company agent of WELLPOINT INC, Blue Cross of California, Blue Cross of Southern California and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Insurance Contract
FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION et al v. SYNGENTA CROP PROTECTION AG et al
as 1:2022cv00828
Plaintiff:
FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, STATE OF COLORADO and others
Defendant:
SYNGENTA CROP PROTECTION AG, SYNGENTA CORPORATION, SYNGENTA CROP PROTECTION, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0053 Federal Trade Commission Act
The State Of Texas, et al v. Google, LLC
as 1:2021cv06841
Plaintiff:
The State of Texas, State of Arkansas, State of Idaho and others
Defendant:
Google LLC
Intervenor Plaintiff:
State of Louisiana and State of South Carolina
Amicus Curiae:
Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press and 23 Media Organizations
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 at Fed. Question: Anti-trust
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
