Antitrust Cases
Cases 81 - 90 of 97
Rochester Drug Co-Operative, Inc. v. Wyeth LLC et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2011cv05481
Plaintiff: ROCHESTER DRUG CO-OPERATIVE, INC.
Defendant: WYETH LLC and WYETH PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
PROFESSIONAL DRUG COMPANY, INC. v. WYETH, INC. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2011cv05479
Defendant: WYETH LLC, WYETH, INC., WYETH PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. and others
Not Yet Classified: HEB GROCERY COMPANY LP, RITE AID CORPORATION, PAINTERS DISTRICT COUNCIL NO. 30 HEALTH & WELFARE FUND and others
Not Classified By Court: FAITH HOCHBERG
In Re: EFFEXOR XR ANTITRUST LITIGATION
Special Master: JONATHAN J. LERNER
Interested Party: IBEW -- NECA Local 505 Health & Welfare Plan, MC -- UA Local 119 Health & Welfare Plan, CADILA HEALTHCARE LIMITED and others
Plaintiff: Individual Direct Purchaser Plaintiffs and PROFESSIONAL DRUG COMPANY, INC.
Petitioner: TIMMY P. THIEN
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 Antitrust Litigation
Rochester Drug Co-Operative, Inc. v. Wyeth LLC et al
as 1:2011cv00221
Plaintiff: Rochester Drug Co-Operative, Inc.
Defendant: Wyeth LLC and Wyeth Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Rochester Drug Co-Operative, Inc. v. Novo Nordisk A/S et al **CASE CLOSED - ALL ENTRIES MUST BE MADE IN 10-12141**
as 2:2010cv12235
Plaintiff: Rochester Drug Co-Operative, Inc.
Defendant: Novo Nordisk A/S and Novo Nordisk, Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
IN RE: Androgel Antitrust Litigation (No. II)
as 1:2009md02084
Plaintiff: George Steven Legrand, Stephen L. LaFrance Holdings, Inc., Maxi Drug, Inc. doing business as Brooks Pharmacy and others
Counter Defendant: Meijer Inc and Rochester Drug Co-Operative Inc
In Re: Androgel Antitrust Litigation (No. II)
Defendant: Unimed Pharmaceuticals Inc, Perrigo Company, Par Pharmaceuticals Inc and others
Respondent: King Drug Company of Florence, Inc., Miami-Luken, Inc., Prescription Supply, Inc. and others
Counter Claimant: Paddock Laboratories Inc
Petitioner: AmerisourceBergen Corp., McKesson Corp., Besins Healthcare, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
ROCHESTER DRUG CO-OPERATIVE, INC v. BOEHRINGER INGELHEIM INTERNATIONAL GMBH et al
as 2:2009cv01088
Plaintiff: ROCHESTER DRUG CO-OPERATIVE, INC
Defendant: BOEHRINGER INGELHEIM INTERNATIONAL GMBH and BOEHRINGER INGELHEIM PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
ROCHESTER DRUG CO-OPERATIVE, INC. v. MERCK & CO., INC. et al
as 3:2009cv04203
Plaintiff: ROCHESTER DRUG CO-OPERATIVE, INC. and ROCHESTER DRUG CO-OPERATIVE, INC.
Defendant: MERCK & CO., INC. and MERCK SHARP & DOHME PHARMACEUTICALS SRL
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 Antitrust Litigation
Rochester Drug Co-Operative Inc v. Unimed Pharmaceuticals Inc et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2009cv00956
Petitioner: Besins Healthcare, Inc., AmerisourceBergen Corp., McKesson Corp. and others
Defendant: Actavis, Inc., Par Pharmaceuticals Inc, Paddock Laboratories Inc and others
Respondent: Burlington Drug co., Miami-Luken, Inc., Value Drug Company and others
Counter Defendant: Rochester Drug Co-Operative Inc
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Rochester Drug Co-Operative Inc v. Unimed Pharmaceuticals Inc et al
as 5:2009cv00226
Plaintiff: Rochester Drug Co-Operative Inc, Rochester Drug Co-Operative Inc, Rochester Drug Co-Operative Inc and others
Defendant: Unimed Pharmaceuticals Inc, Unimed Pharmaceuticals Inc, Solvay Pharmaceuticals Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0001 Antitrust Litigation
ROCHESTER DRUG CO-OPERATIVE, INC. v. BIOVAIL CORPORATION et al
as 2:2008cv02462
Plaintiff: ROCHESTER DRUG CO-OPERATIVE, INC.
Defendant: BIOVAIL CORPORATION, BIOVAIL LABORATORIES, INC., BIOVAIL LABORATORIES INTERNATIONAL SRL and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 25 Clayton Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?