Antitrust Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 56
In re Solodyn (Minocycline Hydrochloride) Antitrust Litigation
as 1:2014md02503
Plaintiff: Sheet Metal Workers Local No. 25 Health & Welfare Fund, United Food and Commercial Workers Local 1776 & Participating Employers Health and Welfare Fund, Fraternal Order of Police, Fort Lauderdale Lodge 31 and others
Not Classified By Court: National Medical Health Card Systems, Inc., California Physicians' Service d/b/a Blue Shield of California, United HealthCare Services, Inc. and others
Defendant: Barr Laboratories, Inc., Matrix Laboratories Ltd., Ranbaxy Laboratories, LTD and others
In Re: Solodyn (Minocycline Hydrochloride) Antitrust Litigation
Consolidated Plaintiff: Consolidated Plaintiffs
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
STATE OF CALIFORNIA v. TEVA PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRIES, LTD. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2019cv03281
Defendant: TEVA PHARMACEUTICALS USA, INC., TEVA PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRIES, LTD., CEPHALON, INC. and others
Plaintiff: STATE OF CALIFORNIA
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
KING DRUG COMPANY OF FLORENCE, INC vs. CEPHALON, INC., ET AL We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2006cv01797
Plaintiff: AMERICAN SALES CO., INC., BURLINGTON DRUG COMPANY, INC., CVS CAREMARK CORPORATION and others
Defendant: BARR LABORATORIES, INC., BARR PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., CEPHALON, INC. and others
Petitioner: TADEKA PHARMACEUTICAL NORTH AMERICA, INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15 Antitrust Litigation
APOTEX, INC. v. CEPHALON, INC. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2006cv02768
Plaintiff: APOTEX, INC.
Defendant: CEPHALON, INC., BARR LABORATORIES, INC., MYLAN LABORATORIES, INC. and others
Petitioner: BROOKS R. BRUNEAU and ROBERT SHEPHERD
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
CVS Pharmacy, Inc. v. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharma GMBH & Co. KG et al
as 1:2016cv00159
Plaintiff: CVS Pharmacy, Inc.
Defendant: Boehringer Ingelheim Pharma GMBH & Co. KG, Boehringer Ingelheim International GmbH, Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
In Re: Modafinil AntiTrust, et al, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 15-3475
Plaintiff - Appellee: J M SMITH CORP, on behalf of itself and all others similarly situated doing business as Smith Drug Company, MEIJER INC, MEIJER DISTRIBUTION INC and others
Defendant - Appellee: CEPHALON INC, TEVA PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRIES LTD, TEVA PHARMACEUTICALS USA INC and others
Defendant - Appellant: MYLAN LABORATORIES INC, RANBAXY LABORATORIES LTD, RANBAXY PHARMACEUTICALS INC and others
Rite Aid Corporation et al v. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharma GMBH & Co. KG et al
as 1:2015cv00663
Plaintiff: Rite Aid Corporation and Rite Aid Hdqtrs. Corp.
Defendant: Boehringer Ingelheim Pharma GMBH & Co. KG, Boehringer Ingelheim International GmbH, Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Walgreen Co. et al v. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharma GMBH & Co. KG et al
as 1:2015cv00604
Plaintiff: Walgreen Co. , The Kroger Co. , Safeway Inc. and others
Defendant: Boehringer Ingelheim Pharma GMBH & Co. KG, Boehringer Ingelheim International GMBH, Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceticals, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
International Union of Operating Engineers Local 49 Health and Welfare Fund v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc., et al
as 0:2014cv01641
Plaintiff: International Union of Operating Engineers Local 49 Health and Welfare Fund
Defendant: Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc., Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd, Barr Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
TWIN CITY IRON WORKERS HEALTH AND WELFARE FUND v. TEVA PHARMACEUTICALS USA, INC. et al
as 2:2014cv01921
Plaintiff: TWIN CITY IRON WORKERS HEALTH AND WELFARE FUND
Defendant: TEVA PHARMACEUTICALS USA, INC., TEVA PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRIES LIMITED, BARR PHARMACEUTICALS INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?