Other Civil Rights Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 300
Berger v. Skully et al
as 1:2024cv00076
Plaintiff: Kenneth Berger
Defendant: William E. Skully, Jr, J. Dean, Michele M. Thomason and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bruce Henry v. Attorney General of the State of Alabama, et al
as 24-10139
Plaintiff: BRUCE HENRY
Defendant: ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF ALABAMA, SHERIFF OF TUSCALOOSA COUNTY, ALABAMA and DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF TUSCALOOSA COUNTY, ALABAMA
Kalim Muhammad v. Wendy's of Bowling Green, Inc., et al
as 23-14126
Plaintiff: KALIM A.R. MUHAMMAD
Defendant: WENDY'S OF BOWLING GREEN, INC., COWIN KNOWLES, CIARA DENNIS and others
Ballard v. State of Alabama (MAG+)
as 2:2023cv00629
Plaintiff: Mr. Stacey Ballard and Stacey Ballard
Defendant: State of Alabama
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Mitchell v. State Of Alabama We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2023cv00325
Plaintiff: Virgil Mitchell
Defendant: State Of Alabama
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
L. M. v. Town of Middleborough, Massachusetts, et al
as 23-1645
Plaintiff / Appellant: L. M., a minor by and through his father and stepmother and natural guardians, Christopher and Susan Morrison
Defendant / Appellee: MIDDLEBOROUGH, MA, MIDDLEBOROUGH SCHOOL COMMITTEE, CAROLYN J. LYONS, Superintendent, Middleborough Public Schools, in her official capacity and others
Amicus Curiae: INSTITUTE FOR FAITH AND FAMILY, PARENTS DEFENDING EDUCATION, FOUNDATION FOR INDIVIDUAL RIGHTS AND EXPRESSION and others
Petitioner: AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION OF MASSACHUSETTS
Helen Doe, et al v. Thomas Horne, et al
as 23-16030
Plaintiff / Appellee: HELEN DOE, parent and next friend of Jane Doe, JAMES DOE, parent and next friend of Jane Doe, KATE ROE, parent and next friend of Megan Roe and others
Defendant / Appellant: THOMAS C. HORNE, in his official capacity as State Superintendent of Public Instruction
Defendant: LAURA TOENJES, in her official capacity as Superintendent of the Kyrene School District, KYRENE SCHOOL DISTRICT, GREGORY SCHOOL and others
Intervenor Defendant / Appellant: WARREN PETERSEN, Senator, President of the Arizona State Senate and BEN TOMA, Representative, Speaker of the Arizona House of Representatives
Amicus Curiae: MARY I. O'CONNOR, CAROL BROWN, PATRICIA SPRATLEN ETEM, VALERIE McCLAIN, AND JAN PALCHIKOFF, CONCERNED WOMEN FOR AMERICA, AND SAMARITAN'S PURSE, INDEPENDENT COUNCIL ON WOMENS SPORT and others
Helen Doe, et al v. Thomas Horne, et al
as 23-16026
Plaintiff / Appellee: HELEN DOE, parent and next friend of Jane Doe, JAMES DOE, parent and next friend of Jane Doe, KATE ROE, parent and next friend of Megan Roe and others
Defendant: THOMAS C. HORNE, in his official capacity as State Superintendent of Public Instruction, LAURA TOENJES, in her official capacity as Superintendent of the Kyrene School District, KYRENE SCHOOL DISTRICT and others
Intervenor Defendant / Appellant: WARREN PETERSEN, Senator, President of the Arizona State Senate and BEN TOMA, Representative, Speaker of the Arizona House of Representatives
Amicus Curiae: MARY I. O'CONNOR, CAROL BROWN, PATRICIA SPRATLEN ETEM, VALERIE McCLAIN, AND JAN PALCHIKOFF, CONCERNED WOMEN FOR AMERICA, AND SAMARITAN'S PURSE, INDEPENDENT COUNCIL ON WOMENS SPORT and others
Dawson v. Buckner et al (MAG+)
as 3:2023cv00431
Plaintiff: Megan E. Dawson
Defendant: Nancy Buckner, Allison Bryars, Stephanie Glispee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
K.C., et al v. Individual Members of the Medical Licensing Board, et al
as 23-2366
Plaintiff / Appellee: K.C., NATHANIEL CLAWSON, BETH CLAWSON and others
Defendant / Appellant: INDIVIDUAL MEMBERS OF THE MEDICAL LICENSING BOARD OF INDIANA, LINDSAY HYER, Executive Director, Indiana Professional Licensing Agency, TODD ROKITA, Attorney General of the State of Indiana and others
Amicus Curiae: FAMILY RESEARCH COUNCIL, ALLIANCE DEFENDING FREEDOM, STATE OF ALABAMA and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?