Cases 21 - 30 of 332
Marc Thielman, et al v. LaVonne Griffin-Valade, et al
as 23-35452
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARC THIELMAN, BEN EDTL, DON POWERS and others
Defendant / Appellee:
SHEMIA FAGAN, in her official capacity as Oregon Secretary of State, CLACKAMAS COUNTY, WASHINGTON COUNTY and others
J. C. v. David Locha, et al
as 23-2013
Plaintiff / Appellant:
J. C., individually, and all others similarly situated
Defendant / Appellee:
DAVID LOCHA, DAVID L. HENRIQUEZ, NICHOLAS EPISCOPO and others
Uviles v. City of New York
as 23-903
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Joel Uviles, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated,
Defendant / Appellee:
The City of New York and Anthony J. Annucci, Acting Commissioner for the New York State Department of Corrections and Community Supervision, in his official capacity,
Medina, et al v. McIff Allen, et al
as 23-4057
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAWN HEPIKIYA MEDINA, JUSTIN HORTON, MADELAINE THOMPSON and others
Defendant / Appellee:
THE HONORABLE ANNE MARIE MCIFF ALLEN, THE HONORABLE JEREMIAH HUMES, THE HONORABLE CHRISTINE JOHNSON and others
Anh Thai, et al v. County of Los Angeles, et al
as 23-55326
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANH TUYET THAI, DON DOAN and TOMMY NGUYEN, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated
Plaintiff:
MOHAMMAD NASSIRI, DIEP THI NGUYEN, ANH VAN THAI and others
Defendant / Appellee:
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, WILLIAM VILLASENOR and DULCE SANCHEZ
Defendant:
STATE AND/OR LOCAL AGENTS LADA and DOES, 1-10
Anh Thai, et al v. County of Los Angeles, et al
as 23-55327
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANH TUYET THAI, DON DOAN and TOMMY NGUYEN, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated
Plaintiff:
MOHAMMAD NASSIRI, DIEP THI NGUYEN, ANH VAN THAI and others
Defendant / Appellee:
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, WILLIAM VILLASENOR and DULCE SANCHEZ
Defendant:
STATE AND/OR LOCAL AGENTS LADA and DOES, 1-10
Lois Gibson v. State of Maryland
as 23-1369
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LOIS ANN GIBSON, MARYLAND 20-20 WATCH, FREDERICK, MARYLAND, CLASS REPRESENTATIVES PURSUANT TO FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 23, AND/OR PUTATIVE CLASSES OF SIMILARLY SITUATED VOTERS OF MARYLAND AND/OR ELSEWHERE IN THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and others
Defendant / Appellee:
THE STATE OF MARYLAND, and Several Agencies of the State, Including at least the State and County Boards of Elections in the Specific Counties Listed herein, A STATE AND NATIONAL RICO ENTERPRISE, IN PART LOCATED IN MARYLAND, AND/OR DOING BUSINESS AS PART OF THE COMMERCE IN MARYLAND WITH COUNTIES, I.E., FREDERICK, HOWARD COUNTY, CARROLL COUNTIES, MARYLAND AND 18 ADDITIONAL COUNTIES OR VOTING JURISDICTIONS, CENTER FOR TECH AND CIVIC LIFE (CTCL), A Chicago IRS Code 501 (c) (3) Corporation and others
Turnage v. Mississippi Power
as 23-60154
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Ray C. Turnage, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Reverend D. Franklin Browne, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Dennis D. Henderson, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Sam Britton, Mississippi Public Service Commissioner, Cecil Brown, Mississippi Public Service Commissioner, Brandon Presley, Mississippi Public Service Commissioner and others
D. B., et al v. Chiquita Brooks-Lasure, et al
as 23-15436
Plaintiff / Appellant:
D. B., as conservator for John Doe 1, C. C., as guardian for Jane Doe 1, JOHN DOE 2 and others
Defendant / Appellee:
CHIQUITA BROOKS-LASURE, in her official capacity as Administrator for the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC HEALTH, TOMAS ARAGON, M.D., in his official capacity as Director of the California Department of Public Health and others
Jennifer Sykes v. Office of the California State Controller, et al
as 23-15377
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JENNIFER I. SYKES, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated
Defendant / Appellee:
OFFICE OF THE CALIFORNIA STATE CONTROLLER and BETTY T. YEE, in her official capacity as California State Controller
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
