Cases 21 - 30 of 44
Tilley v. Union Pacific Rail Road Corp et al
as 3:2016cv02382
Plaintiff:
Angelia L Tilley
Defendant:
Union Pacific Rail Road Corp and International Association of Sheet Metal, Air, Rail, and Transportation Workers
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 151
Garrido v. Union Pacific Railroad Company
as 4:2015cv03165
Plaintiff:
Ronald Garrido
Defendant:
Union Pacific Railroad Company
Cause Of Action: 88 U.S.C. § 8888
Smith v. Union Pacific Railroad Company
as 1:2015cv06456
Defendant:
Union Pacific Railroad Company
Plaintiff:
Carl A. Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
McCormick v. Tribune Company et al
as 1:2015cv05867
Defendant:
ANNew York, McCormick Tribune Foundation, Huntington Pavilion and others
Plaintiff:
Joanna Canzoneri McCormick
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
Owens v. Union Pacific
as 8:2015cv00225
Plaintiff:
Tommy Owens
Defendant:
Union Pacific
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
EEOC v. Union Pacific Railroad Company
as 15-2059
Petitioner - Appellant:
EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION
Respondent - Appellee:
UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY
Jones v. Union Pacific Railroad Company
as 1:2014cv03908
Plaintiff:
James E Jones
Defendant:
Union Pacific Railroad Company and CSX Transportation, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lindsay v. Trans-Canada et al
as 6:2013cv00676
Plaintiff:
Courtland Dewayne Lindsay
Defendant:
Trans-Canada, LaGloria Inc, Union Pacific and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Richard T Poe et al v. County of Riverside et al
as 5:2013cv01530
Defendant:
County of Riverside, Does, Richard A Poe and others
Plaintiff:
Richard T Poe and Robin Rotell
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v Union Pacific Railroad Company
as 2:2013mc00022
Plaintiff:
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission
Defendant:
Union Pacific Railroad Company
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
