Cases 21 - 30 of 38
BROSTEN v. GEORGE WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY
as 1:2014cv00305
Plaintiff:
ERIC BROSTEN
Defendant:
GEORGE WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FLORES v. GEORGE WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY
as 1:2014cv00239
Plaintiff:
ERIC FLORES
Defendant:
GEORGE WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MCGOVERN v. KERRY et al
as 1:2014cv00215
Defendant:
JOHN F. KERRY , CHRISTOPHER BROWN , MICHAEL GLAUBACH and others
Plaintiff:
RAYMOND MCGOVERN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
REAGLE v. UPMC et al
as 2:2011cv01652
Plaintiff:
JOHN REAGLE
Defendant:
UPMC , UPMC PASSAVANT , UPMC PRESBYTERIAN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv00888
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Scott v. United States of America et al
as 4:2010cv00248
Plaintiff:
Vincent Scott
Defendant:
United States of America, St. Louis Metropolitan Police Department, St. Louis Fire Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Clark v. Wake Forest University
as 4:2010cv00200
Plaintiff:
Tarren Clark
Defendant:
Wake Forest University, Forsyth County, Forsyth County Jail and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Charles Pointer v. Ida Early, et al
as 09-3359
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Charles Pointer
Defendant - Appellee:
Ida Early, Michael Cannon, registered agent, One Brookings Drive, Campus Box 1058, St. Louis, MO 63130 and Washington University, St. Louis
Pointer v. Early et al
as 4:2009cv01437
Plaintiff:
Charles Pointer
Defendant:
Ida Early, Michael Cannon and Washington University
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Carolyn Singh v. GW Univ. School of Medicine, et al
as 09-7032
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Carolyn Singh
Defendant - Appellee:
George Washington University School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Rhonda M. Goldberg and John F. Williams
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
