Cases 41 - 47 of 47
Green v. George et al
as 4:2008cv03501
Plaintiff:
Thomas Green
Defendant:
Timothy McNair George and Bobby Lee Jones
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Choate v. Merrill, et al
as 08-1959
Plaintiff:
BRENDA CHOATE, Personal Represenative of the Estate of Ryan Rideout
Defendant - Appellee:
JEFFREY MERRILL, Individually and in his Official Capacity as Warden, Maine Department of Corrections, NELSON REILLY, Individually and in his Official Capacity as Deputy Warden, Maine Department of Corrections, MICHAEL PETERS, Individually and in his Official Capacity as Prison Guard, Maine Department of Corrections and others
Defendant:
ROBERT BEARD, Individually and in his Official Capacity as Prison Guard, Maine Department of Corrections, KATE GERRISH, Individually and in her Official Capacity as Mental Health Worker, Maine Department of Corrections, KATE MATTHEWS, Individually and in her Official Capacity as a Mental Health Worker, Maine Department of Corrections and others
Movant - Appellant:
JONATHAN LEE RICHES
AGEE et al v. SCHAFER
as 1:2008cv00882
Plaintiff:
MARY LEE AGEE, RONNIE ALDRIDGE, VERLENE ALSTON and others
Defendant:
ED SCHAFER, ED SCHAFER, ED SCHAFER and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
CHOATE v. MERRILL et al
as 1:2008cv00049
Plaintiff:
BRENDA CHOATE
Defendant:
BOBBY LEE BEARD
Cross_defendant:
BOBBY LEE BEARD
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Davis v. Harwell et al
as 4:2007cv02781
Plaintiff:
Bernard Coleman Davis
Defendant:
James Harwell, McLeod Hospital, State Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Green v. George et al
as 4:2007cv01678
Plaintiff:
Thomas Green
Defendant:
Timothy McNair George and Bobby Lee Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Carr v. Head et al
as 1:2007cv00180
Plaintiff:
David Harold Carr
Defendant:
J. R. Head, Wilson, Brashaw and others
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
