Cases 41 - 48 of 48
GORDON v. AIG et al
as 2:2009cv00570
Defendant:
BANCORP RHODE ISLAND INC., CAPITAL BANK CORP., PEAPACK GLADSTONE FINANCIAL CORP and others
Plaintiff:
GERALD GORDON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Robert Klure v. June Stough-Dresie et al
as 2:2009cv00098
Plaintiff:
Robert Klure
Defendant:
June Stough-Dresie, Andrew W. Olson, Mark Schellerup and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Forma Pauperis Denial
Barber et al v. Accredited Home Lenders, Inc. et al
as 2:2008cv01647
Plaintiff:
Donald Joe Barber and Brenda Gail Barber
Defendant:
Accredited Home Lenders, Inc., Morgan Stanley ABS Capital One, Inc., Deutsche Bank National Trust Company and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Tessier v. Morgan Stanley & Co., Incorporated
as 4:2008cv00050
Defendant:
Morgan Stanley & Co., Incorporated
Plaintiff:
Sheryl Tessier
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Sanders v. U.S. Government et al
as 1:2008cv00190
Plaintiff:
Leon Sanders
Defendant:
U.S. Government, U.S. President, U.S. Congress and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1985 Consipracy to interfere with civil rights
Millington v. Morgan Stanley Dean Witter et al
as 1:2007cv02850
Plaintiff:
Junior Fitzgerald Millington
Defendant:
Morgan Stanley Dean Witter and Technical Career Institute
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bradley v. Morgan Stanley Dean Witter et al
as 1:2007cv02499
Plaintiff:
Theresa B. Bradley
Defendant:
Morgan Stanley Dean Witter, Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc., John J. Mack and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
SIRAVO et al v. COUNTRY WIDE HOME LOAN et al
as 2:2007cv01112
Plaintiff:
N. V. SIRAVO and F. A. SIRAVO
Defendant:
COUNTRY WIDE HOME LOAN, DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUST COMPANY and MORGAN STANLEY ABS CAPITAL I, INC.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
