Cases 51 - 60 of 96
HIMCHAK v. DYE et al
as 2:2014cv07024
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM A. HIMCHAK, III
Defendant:
DANIEL DYE, CMNWLTH OF PA - PA STATE POLICE, CRAIG BOWMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2014cv09477
Plaintiff:
Robert Johnson
Defendant:
The City of New York , Viet Dang, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Medina v. The City Of New York , et al
as 1:2014cv08128
Plaintiff:
Raymond Medina
Defendant:
The City Of New York, New York City Police Department, Robert Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Martin et al v. The City Of New York , et al
as 1:2014cv06384
Plaintiff:
Nagasta Martin and Robert Johnson
Defendant:
The City Of New York , and NYPD Officers John Does 1 through 10
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nunez v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2014cv04182
Plaintiff:
Francisco Nunez
Defendant:
The City of New York, Damian Diedrick, Cliff Acosta and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cunningham v. State of New York
as 14-752
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Joseph A. Cunningham, Jr.
Defendant - Appellee:
State of New York, Concepcion, Assistant District Attorney, Robert Johnson, Bronx District Attorney and others
Cunningham v. New York State et al
as 1:2014cv00166
Plaintiff:
Joseph A. Cunningham
Defendant:
New York State, Concepcion, Robert Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Johnson et al v. Williams et al
as 5:2014cv00003
Plaintiff:
Robert Johnson and Jeanette Johnson
Defendant:
James Williams, Chris Eldreth, FNU Everette and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bond v. Massachusetts Bay Commuter Rai
as 13-2548
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES BOND
Defendant - Appellee:
MASSACHUSETTS BAY COMMUTER RAILROAD COMPANY
Defendant:
DANA RODRICK, HERBERT ROSS, JOHN MITCHELL and others
JOHNSON v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
as 1:2013cv02039
Plaintiff:
IVER ROBERT JOHNSON, III
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
