Cases 61 - 70 of 255
Harold Jean-Baptiste v. DOJ, et al
as 23-5042
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Harold Jean-Baptiste
Defendant / Appellee:
United States Department of Justice, Merrick B. Garland, Attorney General of the United States, Head of the United States Department of Justice; Named in his official capacity, Federal Bureau of Investigation and others
Jessica Kirby v. US
as 23-1219
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JESSICA KIRBY
Plaintiff:
BRANDEE RITSEMA, LAURIE REYNOLDS, CECELIA EVERTEZ and others
Intervenor Plaintiff:
BEATRICE RIVERA ADAMS, AUDREY LESSNER, BEATRICE RIVERA and others
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, JOE BIDEN, President of the United States Department, KAMALA D. HARRIS, Vice President of the United States and others
Emily O'Dell v. US
as 23-1216
Plaintiff / Appellant:
EMILY O'DELL and WILLIAM O'DELL
Plaintiff:
BRANDEE RITSEMA, LAURIE REYNOLDS, CECELIA EVERTEZ and others
Intervenor Plaintiff:
BEATRICE RIVERA ADAMS, AUDREY LESSNER, BEATRICE RIVERA and others
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, JOE BIDEN, President of the United States Department, KAMALA D. HARRIS, Vice President of the United States and others
Melody Rodgers v. US
as 23-1214
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MELODY RODGERS
Plaintiff:
BRANDEE RITSEMA, LAURIE REYNOLDS, CECELIA EVERTEZ and others
Intervenor Plaintiff:
BEATRICE RIVERA ADAMS, AUDREY LESSNER, BEATRICE RIVERA and others
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, JOE BIDEN, President of the United States Department, KAMALA D. HARRIS, Vice President of the United States and others
Benjamin Coxon et al v. The Attorney General of the United States et al
as 2:2023cv01296
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Coxon
Defendant:
The Attorney General of the United States, The United States Attorneys, The United States Marshals and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act
Elizabeth Andrews v. US
as 23-1164
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ELIZABETH ANDREWS
Plaintiff:
LAURIE REYNOLDS, CECELIA EVERTEZ, RAYMOND SIPULT and others
Intervenor Plaintiff:
BEATRICE RIVERA ADAMS, AUDREY LESSNER, BEATRICE RIVERA and others
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, JOE BIDEN, President of the United States Department, KAMALA D. HARRIS, Vice President of the United States and others
Brandee Ritsema v. US
as 23-1162
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BRANDEE RITSEMA
Plaintiff:
LAURIE REYNOLDS, CECELIA EVERTEZ, RAYMOND SIPULT and others
Intervenor Plaintiff:
BEATRICE RIVERA ADAMS, AUDREY LESSNER, BEATRICE RIVERA and others
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, JOE BIDEN, President of the United States Department, KAMALA D. HARRIS, Vice President of the United States and others
Cohen v. United States of America
as 23-35
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Michael D. Cohen
Defendant / Appellee:
United States of America, Donald J. Trump, Former President of the United States, William P. Barr, Former Attorney General of the United States and others
Kenneth Brown, et al v. John Antony Blinken, et al
as 22-3459
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KENNETH ANDERSON BROWN, Moor Beneficiary
Plaintiff / Appellee:
KB RA-EL EXPRESS TRUST, A Private Moor Aboriginal Virginian National Subject Ambassador At Large and Noble of the Al Moroc Shereefian Empire
Defendant / Appellee:
JOHN ANTONY BLINKEN, d/b/a Antony John Blinken, Secretary of State, JANET LOUISE YELLEN, d/b/a Janet Louise Yellen, Secretary of Treasury, et al United States Heirs and Assignees, MERRICK B. GARLAND, d/b/a Merrick Gardland, et al. Attorney General, et al, United States Heirs and Assignees and others
Debtor / Appellee:
RALPH BREEDEN, III, d/b/a Ralph Breeden III et al d/b/a GA Bar No 195892 attorney at law Hayt, Hayt & Landau, P.L. Heirs and Assignees
Michael Lindell, et al v. United States, et al
as 22-3510
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Michael J. Lindell and MyPillow, Inc.
Defendant / Appellee:
United States of America, Merrick B. Garland, in his official capacity as Attorney General of the United States, United States Attorney, for the District of Minnesota and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
