Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Robinson v. Centurion Correctional Healthcare of New Mexico, LLC et al
as 1:2022cv00748
Plaintiff:
Andrew Robinson
Defendant:
Centurion Correctional Healthcare of New Mexico, LLC, MHM Health Professionals, Inc., David Jablonski and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Fayad v. McMahon et al
as 2:2018cv13982
Plaintiff:
Ray Ahmed Fayad
Defendant:
Ronald Dupuis, Michael Moore, Hamtramck, City of and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
QUINN v. US PRISONER TRANSPORT INC et al
as 2:2018cv00149
Plaintiff:
MEGHAN NICOLE QUINN
Defendant:
US PRISONER TRANSPORT INC, PRISONER TRANSPORT SYSTEMS OF AMERICA LLC, ANDROSCOGGIN COUNTY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GOODWIN v. CLARK, ET AL.
as 1:2015cv00458
Plaintiff:
WESLEY FOUST-GRAHAM GOODWIN
Defendant:
SUSAN KELLY GOODWIN CLARK, NC STATE BAR, NORMAN B. SMITH and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
MURPHY v. SMITH et al
as 1:2015cv00173
Plaintiff:
CAROL MURPHY
Defendant:
JONATHAN SMITH, EARL SAUNDERS, CHARLES HART and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MURPHY v. CASAVANT et al
as 1:2015cv00020
Plaintiff:
CAROL MURPHY
Defendant:
JANE AND JOHN DOE'S, DONALD MARDEN, JOSHUA ROBBINS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
MURPHY v. CASAVANT et al
as 1:2014cv02165
Plaintiff:
CAROL MURPHY
Defendant:
JANE AND JOHN DOE'S, DONALD MARDEN, JOSHUA ROBBINS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Murphy v. Maine, State of et al
as 2:2011cv15510
Plaintiff:
Carol Murphy
Defendant:
Maine, State of, Leigh Saufley, Donald Alexander and others
Murphy, Carol v. St Maine, et al
as 08-7034
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Carol Murphy
Defendant - Appellee:
State of Maine, Joseph Jabar, Robert E. Mullen and others
MURPHY v. STATE OF MAINE et al
as 1:2008cv00153
Plaintiff:
CAROL MURPHY
Defendant:
STATE OF MAINE, JOSEPH JABAR, ROBERT E. MULLEN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
