Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Karri v. Garland et al
as 1:2022cv00055
Plaintiff:
Usha Soujanya Karri
Defendant:
Merrick B. Garland, Debra B. Walker, William Yu and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Colbert v. Loza et al
as 1:2017cv08467
Plaintiff:
Carlen Colbert
Defendant:
Pamela E. Loza, Michael I. Bender, Timothy C. Evans and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Walker v. Ham et al
as 3:2014cv00104
Plaintiff:
Charles B Walker
Defendant:
Joseph A Ham, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, United States Department of Interior, Region 2 of the US Fish and Wildlife Service and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
William Walker v. Lifeskills, Inc., et al
as 12-5956
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIAM B. WALKER
Defendant - Appellee:
LIFESKILLS, INC., JAMES HAMILTON, BARRY WILLIAMS and others
Walker v. United Healthcare Services Incorporated et al
as 2:2011cv00076
Plaintiff:
Michael B Walker
Defendant:
United Healthcare Services Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Jones v. McKenzie
as 1:2010cv00152
Defendant:
Conway, Town of, Tommie C. McKenzie, James O. Mykland and others
Plaintiff:
Margaret Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Karl White v. G. Green, et al
as 09-4324
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KARL E. WHITE, on his own behalf
Defendant - Appellee:
G. MICHAEL GREEN, CHRIS D. ROSATO, IAN MCCURDY and others
Karl White v. G. Green, et al
as 09-4138
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KARL E. WHITE, on his own behalf
Defendant - Appellee:
G. MICHAEL GREEN, CHRIS D. ROSATO, IAN MCCURDY and others
Karl White v. G. Green, et al
as 09-3412
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KARL E. WHITE, on his own behalf
Defendant - Appellee:
G. MICHAEL GREEN, CHRIS D. ROSATO, IAN MCCURDY and others
Walker v. Ridgway et al
as 1:2009cv00163
Plaintiff:
Joseph B Walker and Joseph B Walker
Defendant:
Bryan Ridgway and Jason D Christopher
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
