Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Robert Johnson v. Maria Imperial
as 22-1733
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROBERT W. JOHNSON
Defendant / Appellee:
MARIA L. IMPERIAL, GEICO CORPORATION, STEVEN L. MAURER and others
JOHNSON v. CREDIT ACCEPTANCE CORPORATION et al
as 2:2022cv00377
Plaintiff:
ROBERT W. JOHNSON
Defendant:
CREDIT ACCEPTANCE CORPORATION, AMERICAN CREDIT UNION, CREDIT COLLECTION SERVICES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Imperial et al
as 1:2022cv00078
Plaintiff:
Robert W Johnson
Defendant:
Maria L Imperial, Geico Corporation, Steven L Maurer and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Medical Malpractice
Fayez-Olabi v. Credit Acceptance Corporation
as 2:2021cv05443
Plaintiff:
Donovan Fayez-Olabi
Defendant:
Credit Acceptance Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Fayez-Olabi v. Credit Acceptance Corporation
as 1:2021cv07878
Plaintiff:
Donovan Fayez-Olabi
Defendant:
Credit Acceptance Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
BEY v. ROBERTS et al
as 2:2015cv04540
Plaintiff:
KHALEEM ASIATIC ALLAH BEY
Defendant:
BRETT A. ROBERTS, STEVEN M. JONES, KENNETH S. BOOTH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Khatter v. V & J, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv14419
Plaintiff:
Mohamad Khatter
Defendant:
V & J, Inc., Adam Massie, Steven Zachary and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cunningham v. Credit Acceptance Corporation
as 14-1704
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Joseph A. Cunningham, Jr.
Defendant - Appellee:
Credit Acceptance Corporation, John A. Barone, Judge, Matthew David Sobolewski and others
Cunningham v. Credit Acceptance Corporation et al
as 1:2014cv00693
Plaintiff:
Joseph A. Cunningham
Defendant:
Credit Acceptance Corporation, John A. Barone, Matthew David Sobolewski and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Hines v. Credit Acceptance Corporation
as 2:2013cv15251
Defendant:
Credit Acceptance Corporation
Plaintiff:
Melandie Hines
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
