Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Smith v. Middletown Township of Pennsylvania et al
as 2:2023cv02412
Plaintiff:
Curtis Smith
Defendant:
KS Pools and Patios Company, Inc., Eric Konyves, Middletown Township of Pennsylvania and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Farmer v. Upchurch et al (TV1)
as 1:2021cv00153
Defendant:
Stacy H Farmer, Howard L Upchurch, Daniel H Rader, IV and others
Plaintiff:
Benjmain Briley Farmer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LaPlante v. Emmett, Charter Township of et al
as 1:2019cv00169
Defendant:
Brian Hatch, Francisco Rosado, Calhoun County and others
Plaintiff:
William LaPlante
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lott v. City of Chicago et al
as 1:2018cv01278
Plaintiff:
Deborah Lott
Defendant:
City of Chicago, Luke Opoka, Sean Bottom and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lewis v. Michaud et al
as 8:2017cv01360
Plaintiff:
Shawn Lewis
Defendant:
Paula Michaud, John Richey, Laurie Paro, Esq. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hurse v. Smith et al
as 2:2017cv12657
Plaintiff:
Jimmie Lee Hurse
Defendant:
Curtis Smith, Donald Montgomery, Krystal Davis and others
Gaddy et al v. Land et al
as 1:2017cv00024
Plaintiff:
Thomas Gaddy and Carol Gaddy
Defendant:
George Dwain Land , Clayton Smith , Chad Reese and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241
Ramirez v. A City Cab, Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv01127
Plaintiff:
Austin Ramirez
Defendant:
A City Cab, Inc., Scott Spees, Calhoun, County of and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jamie Anderson v. Curtis Smith, et al
as 11-6298
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMIE D. ANDERSON
Defendant - Appellee:
CURTIS SMITH, JOHN NICOLL, Attorney at Law, RANDALL MORRISON, Attorney at Law and others
Anderson v. Smith et al
as 1:2011cv00163
Plaintiff:
Jamie D Anderson
Defendant:
Curtis - Smith, John Nicoll, Randall Morrison and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
