Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Willoughby v. Clarke et al
as 3:2022cv00567
Plaintiff:
Mike Malcolm Willoughby
Defendant:
Dr. Mary Clarke, Dr. Ericka Young, Dr. C. Alexander and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Boyd v. Village of Mamaroneck, et al
as 7:2019cv07569
Defendant:
County Of Westchester, Ahmed Perov, Cynthia Arce and others
Plaintiff:
Stephen A Boyd
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Askew v. Ambrose et al
as 3:2016cv00798
Plaintiff:
Robert Lee Askew, Jr
Defendant:
Anthony H. Ambrose, Mary Clark, Jim Schneider and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FAKE et al v. PHILADELPHIA COURT OF COMMON PLEAS et al
as 2:2016cv03893
Plaintiff:
BRANDON L. FAKE
Defendant:
PHILADELPHIA COURT OF COMMON PLEAS, KEVIN M. DOUGHERTY, MARGARET T. MURPHY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Victor Valley Union High School District et al v. Maya Satcherwhite et al
as 5:2016cv01414
Defendant:
Mary Clark and Maya Satcherwhite
Plaintiff:
San Bernardino County Superintendent of Schools and Victor Valley Union High School District
Clark v. Yates et al
as 1:2012cv01480
Plaintiff:
Mary Clark
Defendant:
John Yates , John (I) Yates, Daniel J. Oates and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Manbeck et al v. Micka et al
as 7:2007cv02642
Plaintiff:
Peter C. Manbeck, Wendy Gennimi, Jay Durante and others
Defendant:
Eugene Micka, Catherine Micka, Andrew Weingarten and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Manbeck v. Town of Lewisboro et al
as 7:2005cv04576
Plaintiff:
Peter C. Manbeck, Does 1-1000, John Anonymous and others
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Mark Clark and David S. Oltman
Defendant:
Town of Lewisboro, James Nordgren, Peter Barrett and others
Consolidated Defendant:
William Agresta
Alternative Dispute Resolution (Adr) Provider:
Margaret A. Clark
Not Classified By Court:
Adam R. Rose and Peter McQuillen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
