Cases 1 - 10 of 1,835
Rivera v. Alilovich et al
as 4:2024cv06405
Plaintiff:
Mark Rivera
Defendant:
John Stefanski, Cristine Alilovich, City of San Rafael and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rivera v. The City of Portsmouth et al
as 2:2024cv00553
Plaintiff:
Linwood Sr. Rivera
Defendant:
Bay View Gardens/Newport Landing, B H management, Celtic Hills and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rivera v. Change Healthcare
as 3:2024cv00887
Plaintiff:
Linwood L. Rivera, Sr.
Defendant:
Change Healthcare
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Rivera v. Hudson et al
as 2:2024cv00518
Defendant:
Stephanie Hudson, Detective William Baker, WAVY News 10 and others
Plaintiff:
Linwood Sr. Rivera
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Rivera v. City of San Rafael et al
as 4:2024cv05239
Defendant:
Andrew Urton, Chris Hess, City of San Rafael and others
Plaintiff:
Mark Rivera
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
O'Flaherty, et al v. United States Marshals Service, et al
as 24-2116
Defendant:
ADAM GARCIA, UNITED STATES MARSHALS SERVICE, TORRANCE COUNTY and others
Plaintiff:
DYLAN KEITH O'FLAHERTY and NEAL PATRICK O'FLAHERTY
Rivera-Calo v. Miranda-Rodriguez et al
as 3:2024cv01327
Defendant:
Hector Custodio-Cruz, Ismael Miranda-Rodriguez, Juan A. Rodriguez-Davila and others
Plaintiff:
Luis Antonio Rivera-Calo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Rivera v. Diversified Recovery Bureau LLC
as 1:2024cv01952
Defendant:
Diversified Recovery Bureau LLC
Plaintiff:
Dorian N. Rivera
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Terhorst et al v. Shropshire et al
as 5:2024cv00697
Defendant:
Daniel O Thomas, Susan Allen, Stephen Hankins and others
Plaintiff:
Mark A Terhorst and Robert T Terhorst
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
