Cases 1 - 10 of 43
BROWN v. GOVERNOR'S OFFICE FOR THE STATE OF GEORGIA et al
as 7:2022cv00112
Plaintiff:
BROWN BROWN
Defendant:
GOVERNOR'S OFFICE FOR THE STATE OF GEORGIA, GEORGIA SECRETARY OF STATE, INSPECTOR GENERAL OFFICE FOR THE STATE OF GEORGIA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Robertson v. Warnock et al
as 1:2021cv01468
Defendant:
Sonny Perdue, Paul Guerrucci, Steven C. Jones and others
Plaintiff:
Melvin Robertson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Apache Stronghold v. United States of America et al
as 2:2021cv00050
Defendant:
Sonny Perdue, Neil Bosworth, Vicki Christensen and others
Plaintiff:
Apache Stronghold
Amicus Curiae:
MICA Group, Morningstar Institute and Ramon Riley
Intervenor Defendant:
Resolution Copper Mining LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Nash v. Perdue
as 2:2020cv01359
Defendant:
Sonny Perdue
Plaintiff:
Benjamin E. Nash
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Leo v. New York State Department of Environmental Conservation et al
as 6:2020cv07039
Defendant:
William Powell, Sonny Perdue, Andrea D'Ambrosio and others
Plaintiff:
Carrie M. Leo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LaRue v. United States Department of Agriculture et al
as 1:2020cv01142
Defendant:
USDA, Sonny Perdue, Richard Fordyce and others
Plaintiff:
Sheryl LaRue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Hinton v. Perdue
as 5:2020cv00062
Plaintiff:
Seantoya Hinton
Defendant:
Secretary of USDA Sonny Perdue
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 791
Pabon v. Perdue et al
as 3:2019cv02155
Defendant:
Sonny Perdue, US Department of Agriculture and United States of America
Plaintiff:
Carolyn A. Pabon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Johnson v. Perdue
as 1:2019cv23666
Defendant:
Sonny Perdue
Plaintiff:
Ashley Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
SHARP v. PERDUE
as 1:2019cv02393
Defendant:
SONNY PERDUE
Plaintiff:
RASHARI SHARP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
