Cases 1 - 10 of 34
Andy Kim, et al v. Christine Hanlon, et al
as 24-1593
Plaintiff:
ANDY KIM, in his personal capacity as a candidate for U.S. Senate, ANDY KIM FOR NEW JERSEY, SARAH SCHOENGOOD and others
Defendant:
CHRISTINE G. HANLON, in her official capacity as Monmouth County Clerk, SCOTT M. COLABELLA, in his official capacity as Ocean County Clerk, PAULA SOLLAMI COVELLO, in her official capacity as Mercer County Clerk and others
Intervenor:
CAMDEN COUNTY DEMOCRATIC COMMITTEE
Andy Kim, et al v. Christine Hanlon, et al
as 24-1602
Plaintiff:
ANDY KIM, in his personal capacity as a candidate for U.S. Senate, ANDY KIM FOR NEW JERSEY, SARAH SCHOENGOOD and others
Defendant:
CHRISTINE G. HANLON, in her official capacity as Monmouth County Clerk, SCOTT M. COLABELLA, in his official capacity as Ocean County Clerk, PAULA SOLLAMI COVELLO, in her official capacity as Mercer County Clerk and others
Intervenor:
CAMDEN COUNTY DEMOCRATIC COMMITTEE
Andy Kim, et al v. Christine Hanlon, et al
as 24-1601
Plaintiff:
ANDY KIM, in his personal capacity as a candidate for U.S. Senate, ANDY KIM FOR NEW JERSEY, SARAH SCHOENGOOD and others
Defendant:
CHRISTINE G. HANLON, in hr official capacity as Monmouth County Clerk, SCOTT M. COLABELLA, in his official capacity as Ocean County Clerk, PAULA SOLLAMI COVELLO, in her official capacity as Mercer County Clerk and others
Intervenor:
CAMDEN COUNTY DEMOCRATIC COMMITTEE
Andy Kim, et al v. Christine Hanlon, et al
as 24-1594
Plaintiff:
ANDY KIM, in his personal capacity as a candidate for U.S. Senate, ANDY KIM FOR NEW JERSEY, SARAH SCHOENGOOD and others
Defendant:
SCOTT M. COLABELLA, in his official capacity as Ocean County Clerk, PAULA SOLLAMI COVELLO, in her official capacity as Mercer County Clerk, MARY H. MELFI, in her capacity as Hunterdon County Clerk and others
Intervenor:
CAMDEN COUNTY DEMOCRATIC COMMITTEE
KIM et al v. HANLON et al
as 3:2024cv01098
Plaintiff:
ANDY KIM, ANDY KIM FOR NEW JERSEY, SARAH SCHOENGOOD and others
Defendant:
CHRISTINE GIORDANO HANLON, SCOTT M. COLABELLA, PAULA SOLLAMI COVELLO and others
Intervenor:
LAURA ALI, JOSE ARANGO, New Jersey Republican Chairs Association and others
Amicus Curiae:
AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION OF NEW JERSEY, Election Law Clinic at Harvard Law School, Asian American Legal Defense and Education Fund and others
Interested Party:
DALE CROSS, JEFF PARROTT and TAHESHA WAY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hafner v. Scott et al
as 2:2024cv00165
Plaintiff:
Eric Hafner
Defendant:
Phillip B. Scott, Charity R. Clark and Sarah Copeland Hanzas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Grant et al v. Knapp et al
as 2:2023cv06838
Plaintiff:
Trudy B Grant, Sarah Krawcheck, Nashonda Hunter and others
Defendant:
Howard Knapp, John Wells, JoAnne Day and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Eubanks v. Nelson
as 23-10936
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Travis Wayne Eubanks, a voter of Bexar County, Texas, Travis Eubanks, a voter of Bexar County, Texas, Kyle Strongin, a voter of Hood County, Texas and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Jane Nelson, Texas Secretary of State, John B. Scott, in his individual capacity and in his official capacity as the Texas Secretary of State, Jose "Joe" A. Esparza, in his individual capacity and in his official capacity as Deputy Secretary of State and others
Appellant:
Anne Stone and Allyson Raskin
The State of Georgia v. Mark Meadows
as 23-12958
Plaintiff / Appellee:
THE STATE OF GEORGIA
Defendant / Appellant:
MARK RANDALL MEADOWS
Amicus Curiae:
ERWIN CHEMERINSKY, AMY LEE COPELAND, SARAH R. SALDANA and others
Not Classified By Court:
SERVICE, DONALD B. AYER, JOHN J. FARMER, JR. and others
The State of Georgia v. Meadows
as 1:2023cv03621
Plaintiff:
The State of Georgia
Defendant:
Mark Randall Meadows
Amicus Curiae:
Cynthia Alksne, Erwin Chemerinsky, Amy Copeland and others
Petitioner:
David Andrew Christenson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal - Suit against Federal Officer
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
