Voting Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 210
Frank Townsend, et al v. Bob Watson, et al
as 24-1926
Plaintiff: Frank Townsend, Reverend, Lewis T. Daniels, Charlie P. Reedy and others
Defendant: Bob Watson, Individually and in His Official Capacity as Superintendent of the El Dorado School District No. 15, a Public Body Corporate, El Dorado School District #15, Board of Education of the, Michael Meeks, Member, Board of Education, El Dorado School District No. 15 and others
Intervenor: Arkansas Department of Education and Arkansas State Board of Education
Type: Civil Rights Voting
Alabama State Conference of the NAACP et al v. Marshall et al
as 2:2024cv00420
Plaintiff: Alabama State Conference of the NAACP, League of Women Voters of Alabama, League of Women Voters of Alabama Education Fund and others
Defendant: Steve Marshall, William R Adair, T Kirke Adams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
LULAC v. Abbott
as 24-50128
Plaintiff: League of United Latin American Citizens, Southwest Voter Registration Education Project, Mi Familia Vota and others
Defendant: Greg Abbott, in his official capacity as Governor of the State of Texas
Wicomico County Branch of the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People et al v. Wicomico County, Maryland
as 1:2023cv03325
Plaintiff: Wicomico County Branch of the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People, Caucus of African American Leaders, Watchmen with One Voice Ministerial Alliance and others
Defendant: Wicomico County, Maryland, Wicomico County Board of Education, Wicomico County Board of Elections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1973 Voting Rights Act
USA v. Paxton
as 23-50885
Plaintiff / Appellee: La Union del Pueblo Entero, Friendship-West Baptist Church, Southwest Voter Registration Education Project and others
Defendant / Appellant: Ken Paxton, Attorney General, State of Texas, Jane Nelson, in her official capacity as Texas Secretary of State, State of Texas and others
Petitioner / Appellant: Republican National Committee
Kenneth Simon, et al v. Mike DeWine, et al
as 23-3910
Plaintiff / Appellant: REVEREND KENNETH L. SIMON, REVEREND LEWIS W. MACKLIN, II and HELEN YOUNGBLOOD
Defendant / Appellee: MIKE DEWINE, Governor and Member of the Ohio Redistricting Commission, FRANK LAROSE, Secretary of State and Member of the Ohio Redistricting Commission, OHIO REDISTRICTING COMMISSION and others
Eubanks v. Nelson
as 23-10936
Plaintiff / Appellant: Travis Wayne Eubanks, a voter of Bexar County, Texas, Travis Eubanks, a voter of Bexar County, Texas, Kyle Strongin, a voter of Hood County, Texas and others
Defendant / Appellee: Jane Nelson, Texas Secretary of State, John B. Scott, in his individual capacity and in his official capacity as the Texas Secretary of State, Jose "Joe" A. Esparza, in his individual capacity and in his official capacity as Deputy Secretary of State and others
Appellant: Anne Stone and Allyson Raskin
Election Integrity Project California, Inc., et al v. Shirley Weber, et al
as 23-55726
Plaintiff / Appellant: ELECTION INTEGRITY PROJECT CALIFORNIA, INC., JAMES P. BRADLEY, MARK REED and others
Defendant / Appellee: SHIRLEY WEBER, California Secretary of State, ROB BONTA, California Attorney General, SHANNON BUSHEY, Santa Clara County Registrar of Voters and others
DOUGHTIE v. DESANTIS et al
as 1:2023cv00210
Plaintiff: NATH C DOUGHTIE
Defendant: RON DESANTIS, ASHLEY MOODY, CORD BYRD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Means et al v. DeSoto Parish et al
as 5:2023cv00669
Plaintiff: David B. Means, Ryan Dupree, Robert G. Burford and others
Defendant: DeSoto Parish, DeSoto Parish Police Jury, Parish of DeSoto and others
Amicus Curiae: Legal Defense Fund, Louisiana State Conference of the N A A C P and DeSoto Parish Branch of the N A A C P
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?