Cases 1 - 10 of 72
Lawson et al v. Hargett et al
as 3:2024cv00538
Plaintiff:
Phillip Lawson, Gabe Hart, Victor Ashe and others
Defendant:
Tre Hargett, Mark Goins, Steven R. Finney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Scheppele et al v. The Board of Trustees of Billings, Montana, School District No. 2 et al
as 1:2023cv00022
Plaintiff:
Michael Scheppele and James Y. Wilson
Defendant:
The Board of Trustees of Billings, Montana, School District No. 2, Janna Hafer, Roger Santala and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Arkansas United, et al v. John Thurston, et al
as 23-1154
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Arkansas United and L. Mireya Reith
Defendant / Appellant:
John Thurston, in his official capacity as the Secretary of State of Arkansas, Sharon Brooks, in her official capacity as a member of the Arkansas State Board of Election Commissioners, Bilenda Harris-Ritter, in her official capacity as a member of the Arkansas State Board of Election Commissioners and others
Defendant:
Remee Oelschlaeger, in her official capacity as a member of the Washington County Election Commission, Bill Ackerman, in his official capacity as a member of the Washington County Election Commission, Max Deitchler, in his official capacity as a member of the Washington County Election Commission and others
Lower Brule Sioux Tribe et al v. Lyman County et al
as 3:2022cv03008
Plaintiff:
Lower Brule Sioux Tribe, Neil Pierre Russell, Stephanie Bolman and others
Defendant:
Lyman County, Lyman County Board of Commissioners, Brian Kraus and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
Ayers et al v. Hargett et al (TV1)
as 3:2022cv00370
Plaintiff:
Betty Jane Ayers, David Russell Ayers and Sarah Walker Bruun
Defendant:
Tre Hargett, Mark Stephens, Gen. Jonathan Skrmetti and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Lower Brule Sioux Tribe, et al v. Lyman County, et al
as 22-3078
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Lower Brule Sioux Tribe, Neil Pierre Russell, individual member of the Lower Brule Sioux Tribe, Stephanie Bolman, individual member of the Lower Brule Sioux Tribe and others
Defendant / Appellant:
Lyman County, Lyman County Board of Commissioners, Brian Kraus, in his official capacity as Lyman County Commissioner and others
Lower Brule Sioux Tribe, et al v. Lyman County, et al
as 22-2748
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Lower Brule Sioux Tribe, Neil Pierre Russell, individual member of the Lower Brule Sioux Tribe, Stephanie Bolman, individual member of the Lower Brule Sioux Tribe and others
Defendant / Appellant:
Lyman County, Lyman County Board of Commissioners, Brian Kraus, in his official capacity as Lyman County Commissioner and others
Bruun et al v. Hargett et al (TV2)
as 3:2022cv00292
Plaintiff:
Sarah Walker Bruun, David Russell Ayers and Betty Jane Ayers
Defendant:
Tre Hargett and Mark Stephens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Injunction
Arkansas United, et al v. John Thurston, et al
as 22-2918
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Arkansas United and L. Mireya Reith
Defendant / Appellant:
John Thurston, in his official capacity as the Secretary of State of Arkansas, Sharon Brooks, in her official capacity as a member of the Arkansas State Board of Election Commissioners, Bilenda Harris-Ritter, in her official capacity as a member of the Arkansas State Board of Election Commissioners and others
Defendant:
Remee Oelschlaeger, in her official capacity as a member of the Washington County Election Commission, Bill Ackerman, in his official capacity as a member of the Washington County Election Commission, Max Deitchler, in his official capacity as a member of the Washington County Election Commission and others
Worcester Interfaith, Inc. et al v. City of Worcester, Massachusetts et al
as 4:2021cv40015
Plaintiff:
Nelly Medina, Ruth Rodriguez-Fay, Delia Vega and others
Defendant:
Candy Mero-Carlson, John Stewart, Worcester Board of Election Commissioners and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
