Voting Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 318
United Sovereign Americans, Inc. et al v. Commonwealth Of Pennsylvania et al
as 1:2024cv01003
Plaintiff: United Sovereign Americans, Inc., Diane Houser, Ruth Moton and others
Defendant: Commonwealth Of Pennsylvania, Al Schmidt, Pennsylvania Bureau of Elections and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
LULAC v. Abbott
as 24-50449
Plaintiff: League of United Latin American Citizens, Southwest Voter Registration Education Project, Mi Familia Vota and others
Defendant: Greg Abbott, in his official capacity as Governor of the State of Texas
League of Women Voters of New Hampshire et al v. Kramer et al
as 1:2024cv00073
Plaintiff: League of Women Voters of New Hampshire, League of Women Voters of the United States, Nancy Marashio and others
Defendant: Steve Kramer, Lingo Telecom, LLC and Life Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
People of the State of Colorado (PS) et al v. Democratic Party of Colorado et al
as 1:2024cv01097
Plaintiff: People of the State of Colorado and Kurt Overturf
Defendant: Democratic Party of Colorado, National (US) Democratic Party, Dominion Voting Systems and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Nairne v. Landry
as 24-30115
Plaintiff: Dorothy Nairne, Doctor, Clee E. Lowe, Reverend, Alice Washington, Doctor and others
Defendant: Nancy Landry, in her official capacity as Secretary of State of Louisiana
Intervenor: State of Louisiana, by and through Attorney General Elizabeth B. Murrill, Phillip DeVillier, in his official official capacity as Speaker of the Louisiana House of Representative, Cameron Henry, in his official capacity as President of the Louisiana Senate and others
Pennsylvania State Conference of NAACP Branches, et al v. Northampton County Board of Elections, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 23-3166
Plaintiff / Appellee: PENNSYLVANIA STATE CONFERENCE OF NAACP BRANCHES, LEAGUE OF WOMAN VOTERS OF PENNSYLVANIA, PHILADELPHIANS ORGANIZED TO WITNESS EMPOWER AND REBUILD and others
Defendant / Appellee: NORTHAMPTON COUNTY BOARD OF ELECTIONS, SECRETARY COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, ADAMS COUNTY BOARD OF ELECTIONS and others
Not Yet Classified: RICHARD MARINO, DEMOCRATIC SENATORIAL CAMPAIGN COMMITTEE, DEMOCRATIC CONGRESSIONAL CAMPAIGN COMMITTEE and others
Intervenor Defendant / Appellant: REPUBLICAN NATIONAL COMMITTEE, NATIONAL REPUBLICAN CONGRESSIONAL COMMITTEE and REPUBLICAN PARTY OF PENNSYLVANIA
Appellant: STATE OF ALABAMA, BRYAN CUTLER, KIM WARD and others
Amicus Curiae: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Appellee: THE PROTECT DEMOCRACY PROJECT and SENIORLAW CENTER
USA v. Paxton
as 23-50885
Plaintiff / Appellee: La Union del Pueblo Entero, Friendship-West Baptist Church, Southwest Voter Registration Education Project and others
Defendant / Appellant: Ken Paxton, Attorney General, State of Texas, Jane Nelson, in her official capacity as Texas Secretary of State, State of Texas and others
Petitioner / Appellant: Republican National Committee
Sansone v. United States Patent and Trademark Office et al
as 1:2024cv00019
Plaintiff: Stanley A. Sansone
Defendant: United States Patent and Trademark Office, United States Patent and Trademark Office Director and Kathi Vidal
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241 Conspiracy Against Citizen Rights
Coakley Pendergrass, et al v. Secretary, State of Georgia
as 23-13916
Plaintiff / Appellee: COAKLEY PENDERGRASS, TRIANA ARNOLD JAMES, ELLIOTT HENNINGTON and others
Defendant / Appellant: SECRETARY, STATE OF GEORGIA
Intervenor / Appellee: THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Annie Grant, et al v. Secretary, State of Georgia
as 23-13921
Intervenor / Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff / Appellee: ANNIE LOIS GRANT, QUENTIN T. HOWELL, ELROY TOLBERT and others
Defendant / Appellant: SECRETARY, STATE OF GEORGIA, SARA TINDALL GHAZAL, ANH LE and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?