Cases 61 - 70 of 194
Barberi v. Double Royal Finance Company et al
as 1:2017cv21499
Plaintiff:
Renzo Barberi
Defendant:
Double Royal Finance Company, Robert H. Ehrman and Marlys A. Ehrman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182
Barberi v. Splish Splash Auto Sales, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv21488
Plaintiff:
Renzo Barberi
Defendant:
Splish Splash Auto Sales, Inc., Robert H. Ehrman and Marlys Ehrman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182
Barberi v. South Dixie Tires Co. et al
as 1:2017cv21408
Plaintiff:
Renzo Barberi
Defendant:
South Dixie Tires Co. , Robert H. Ehrman and Marlys A. Ehrman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182
Jocelyn Landers et al v. 22702 Pacific Park Drive, LP
as 8:2017cv00544
Defendant:
22702 Pacific Park Drive, LP
Plaintiff:
C. H., J. H. and Jocelyn Landers
Victor Hernandez et al v. Daniel Cerda et al
as 5:2017cv00186
Defendant:
Daniel Cerda, Virginia Cerda and Does
Plaintiff:
D. H., F. H., V. H. and others
Hodge v. The Cordish Companies Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv00254
Plaintiff:
Harold H. Hodge, Jr.
Defendant:
The Cordish Companies Inc., David S. Cordish, Chase Martin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Barrow v. Barrow, Jr., et al
as 17-1035
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANITA M. BARROW
Defendant - Appellee:
HERBERT A. BARROW, JR., WILLINDA POWELL GRAY, MICHELLE MALDONADO, Esq., Individually and in her capacity as Executrix and others
R.H., et al v. City of Anna, Illinois
as 3:2016cv01234
Defendant:
City of Anna, Illinois
Plaintiff:
R. H. and Rehabilitation and Vocational Education Program, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Ajai v. Laramar Management Services LLC
as 1:2016cv08700
Plaintiff:
Sarai H. Ajai
Defendant:
Laramar Management Services LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Ambort v. Department of Housing and Urban Development et al
as 3:2016cv03033
Plaintiff:
Glenn Ambort, Hollie Telford and Marti Lundahl
Defendant:
Department of Housing and Urban Development, Alan B. Johnson, Nena James and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
