Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Harden v. Clearwater Key Association Inc. et al
as 8:2024cv00004
Plaintiff:
Jon B. Harden
Defendant:
Clearwater Key Association Inc., David Hinderliter, Gwynda L. Patterson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 3601 Fair Housing Act
United States of America v. Whitescarver et al
as 1:2020cv00054
Defendant:
Betsy Whitescarver and Chester Gordon Whitescarver
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
WOMACK et al v. HOUSING AUTHORITY OF CHESTER COUNTY
as 2:2019cv04962
Plaintiff:
DEVONDRIAN WOMACK and MELLISSA WOMACK
Defendant:
HOUSING AUTHORITY OF CHESTER COUNTY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1437
Barberi v. West Chester Animal Hospital, Inc.
as 1:2016cv24830
Plaintiff:
Renzo Barberi
Defendant:
West Chester Animal Hospital, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182
FOGAM v. CROZER-CHESTER MEDICAL CENTER
as 2:2010cv00855
Plaintiff:
JUSTINE FOGAM
Defendant:
CROZER-CHESTER MEDICAL CENTER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
United States Department of Justice v. Enclave Development, LLC et al
as 2:2009cv10116
Plaintiff:
United States Department of Justice
Defendant:
Enclave Development, LLC, MCS Associates, Incorporated, Robert Lipka and Associates and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Fair Housing Act
Spikes v. Champion Tire Center, Inc. et al
as 3:2008cv02176
Plaintiff:
Karel Spikes
Defendant:
Champion Tire Center, Inc., Chester A. Coolong and Does 1 through 10
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Buesgens v. Freeland et al
as 1:2007cv00444
Plaintiff:
Michael L. Buesgens
Defendant:
Christine C. Freeland, Debra Wehmeier, Charles Eads Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Buesgens v. Freeland et al
as 8:2007cv01363
Plaintiff:
Michael L. Buesgens
Defendant:
Christine C. Freeland, Debra Wehmeier, Charles Eads Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
