Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 187
Stewart v. Hill We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 23-10111
Plaintiff / Appellee: Albert G. Hill, III, individually, and as a Beneficiary of the Margaret Hunt Trust Estate, derivatively on behalf of the Margaret Hunt Trust Estate, individually, As a beneficiary of the Haroldson Lafayette Hunt Jr. Trust Estate, and derivately on Be
Defendant / Appellee: William Schilling, individually and in his capacity as a member of the Advisory Board MHTE and a member of the Advisory Board of the HHTE, Ivan Irwin, Jr., Alinda H. Wikert and others
Petitioner / Appellant: Marco Antonio Montemayor, Esq. and Kenneth Robert Stewart, Jr., also known as Kenneth R. Stewart, Jr.
Type: Other Statutes RICO
Bridget Ward, et al v. Crow Vote, LLC, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 22-56108
Plaintiff / Appellant: BRIDGET WARD and LISA WARD, on behalf of themselves and all persons similarly situated
Defendant / Appellee: CROW VOTE, LLC, DARRIN AUSTIN and EDWARD MATNEY
Caswell County, North Carolina et al v. McKinsey and Company, Inc.
as 3:2022cv07038
Plaintiff: Caswell County, North Carolina et al, CITY OF GREENSBORO, NORTH CAROLINA, DAVIE COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA and others
Defendant: McKinsey and Company, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
CASWELL COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA et al v. MCKINSEY AND COMPANY, INC.
as 1:2022cv00904
Plaintiff: CASWELL COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA, CITY OF GREENSBORO, NORTH CAROLINA, DAVIE COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA and others
Defendant: McKinsey and Company, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
LM General Insurance Company, et al v Northland Radiology, Inc, et al
as 2:2022cv12211
Plaintiff: LM General Insurance Company, LM Insurance Corporation, Liberty Mutual Personal Insurance Company and others
Defendant: Northland Radiology, Inc., Great Lakes Pain & Injury Centers LLC, Pioneer Lab Houston LP and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Felipe Gomez v. Larry Weisenthal, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 22-55833
Plaintiff / Appellant: FELIPE NERY GOMEZ, personally, and as Former non-attorney Custodian for Arthur Gomez
Defendant / Appellee: LARRY WEISENTHAL, CONNIE WEISENTHAL, as former Trustee and personally, RICK FENELLI, Atty No. 68879 and others
Blane E. Taylor Welding, Inc. et al v. LG Funding, LLC et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2022cv07623
Plaintiff: Blane E. Taylor Welding, LLC, Blane E Taylor and Blane E. Taylor Welding, Inc.
Defendant: LG Funding, LLC, Joseph Lerman, Ontrack Funding, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Liberty Insurance Corporation et al v. Advance Chiropractic PLLC et al
as 2:2022cv11813
Plaintiff: Liberty Insurance Corporation, Liberty Mutual Fire Insurance Company, Liberty Mutual Insurance Company and others
Defendant: Advance Chiropractic PLLC, Affiliated Diagnostic of Oakland, LLC, Carepointe Physical Therapy LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Liberty Mutual Insurance Company et al v. Aftermath Services LLC et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2022cv11052
Plaintiff: Liberty Mutual Insurance Company, Liberty Mutual Fire Ins Co and Liberty Mutual Personal Insurance Company
Defendant: Aftermath Services LLC, Aftermath Holdings LLC, J Douglas Berto and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Liberty Mutual Mid Atlantic Insurance Company et al v. Advanced Comprehensive Laboratory, LLC et al
as 1:2022cv03541
Plaintiff: Liberty Mutual Mid Atlantic Insurance Company, Liberty Mutual Personal Insurance Company, LM Insurance Corporation and others
Defendant: Advanced Comprehensive Laboratory, LLC, Yan Moshe, Mark Gladstein, M.D. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?