Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Cases
Cases 21 - 30 of 797
Hassell v. Kimbark et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2023cv00472
Plaintiff: Matthew-Lane Hassell
Defendant: Devin Aileen Kimbark, Cheryl L. Kimbark, Mark Kimbark and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Allstate Insurance Company et al v. Vine, MD et al
as 1:2023cv08070
Plaintiff: Allstate Insurance Company, Allstate Indemnity Company, Allstate Property & Casualty Insurance Company and others
Defendant: Mark H. Vine, MD, Sergey Alekseyevich Kalitenko, MD, Sooraj Nitin Poonawala, DO and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
R.J. Kulick v. Reed H. Olmstead et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2023cv09335
Plaintiff: R. J. Kulick
Defendant: Reed H. Olmstead, Law Offices of Reed H. Olmstead and Does 1-100, Inclusive
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
ROCHE DIAGNOSTICS CORPORATION et al v. SMITH, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2019cv08761
Plaintiff: ROCHE DIABETES CARE, INC. and ROCHE DIAGNOSTICS CORPORATION
Cross Defendant: MERCATO MANAGEMENT, LLC, MERCATO PARTNERS AI II, L.P., KESMAN HUGHES & COMPANY, LLC and others
Defendant: SAHILY PAOLINE, MERCATO PARTNERS GROWTH II, L.P., MERCATO PARTNERS INGRAM CO-INVEST, LLC and others
Cross Claimant: JEFFREY C. SMITH
3Rd Party Plaintiff: ZIONS BANCORPORATION, N.A.
Special Master: THE HONORABLE DENNIS M. CAVANAUGH
Interested Party: Bradley W. Howard and Jeffrey S. Baird
3Rd Party Defendant: EXPRESS SCRIPTS HOLDING COMPANY D/B/A EXPRESS SCRIPTS, CVS CAREMARK, XYZ Corporation Pharmacy Benefit Managers 1-99 and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Hunt v. Meta Platforms, Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2023cv04953
Plaintiff: Justin Hunt
Defendant: Meta Platforms, Inc., Google, LLC, Alphabet, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Friedrich Lu v. Jane Young, et al
as 23-2496
Plaintiff / Appellant: FRIEDRICH LU
Defendant / Appellee: JANE E. YOUNG, JOE H. TUCKER, JR., LESLIE M. GREENSPAN and others
Defendant: WALTER T. MITCHELL, JAHAD HASAN, ERIC T. DONOVAN and others
Kelly v. Hilltop Inn Motel Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 0:2023cv03087
Plaintiff: Stephen P. Kelly
Defendant: Hilltop Inn Motel Inc., Gordon H. Eibensteiner, Jane Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Diagnositc Affiliates of Northeast Hou, LLC v. United Health Group,Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv00131
Counter Claimant: Siemens Corporation Group Insurance and Flexible Benefits Program, Kellogg Brown & Root, Inc. Welfare Benefits Plan, Brookdale Senior Living, Inc. Welfare Plan and others
Defendant: AT&T Umbrella Benefit Plan No.1, Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom Partners' Welfare Benefits Plan, Apple Inc. Health and Welfare Benefit Plan and others
Plaintiff: Diagnositc Affiliates of Northeast Hou, LLC dba 24 Hour Covid RT-PCR Laboratory and Diagnostic Affiliates of Northeast Hou, LLC doing business as 24 Hour COVIDRT-PCR Laboratory
Cross Defendant: OptumHealth Care Solutions, Inc. and UHG, Inc, Group Benefits Plan
Cross Claimant: Envision Healthcare Corporation Welfare Benefits Plan
Counter Defendant: Diagnostic Affiliates of Northeast Hou, LLC
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Dimitar Petlechkov v. FEDEX Corporation, et al
as 23-12259
Plaintiff / Appellant: DIMITAR PETLECHKOV
Defendant / Appellee: FEDEX CORPORATION, FEDERAL EXPRESS CORPORATION, FEDEX CORPORATE SERVICES INC and others
Syed Hussain, et al v. H. Stadelman, et al
as 23-12350
Plaintiff / Appellant: SYED IBRAHIM HUSSAIN, SYED MUHAMMAD BAQIR HUSSAIN, SYEDA SARA HUSSAIN and others
Defendant / Appellee: H. JAMES STADELMAN, INTERVAL TITLE SERVICES, INC., JONATHAN BLOOM and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?