Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Cases
Cases 71 - 80 of 142
JAYE v. OAK KNOLL VILLAGE CONDOMINIUM OWNERS ASSOCIATION, INC. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2015cv08324
Plaintiff: CHRIS ANN JAYE
Defendant: OAK KNOLL VILLAGE CONDOMINIUM OWNERS ASSOCIATION, INC. , ERICK P. SPRONCK , ROBERT A. STEPHENSON and others
Cross_claimant: CLINTON TOWNSHIP SEWER AUTHORITY , FOX CHASE CONTRACTING, LLC and FREY ENGINEERING
Cross_defendant: CLINTON TOWNSHIP SEWER AUTHORITY , ACCESS PROPERTY MANAGEMENT , EDWARD BERMAN, ESQ. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
JAYE v. OAK KNOLL VILLAGE CONDOMINIUM OWNERS ASSOCIATION, INC. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2015cv08324
Plaintiff: CHRIS ANN JAYE
Defendant: OAK KNOLL VILLAGE CONDOMINIUM OWNERS ASSOCIATION, INC., ERICK P. SPRONCK, ROBERT A. STEPHENSON and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
Dickson v. U.S. Department of Justice Attorney General of the U.S.A. Mrs. Loretta E. Lynch et al
as 4:2015cv00121
Plaintiff: John M. Dickson, Jr.
Defendant: U.S. Department of Justice Attorney General of the U.S.A. Mrs. Loretta E. Lynch, Mr. Eric Holder Former Attorney General of the U.S.A. of Covington & Burling LLP, U.S. Dept of Justice U.S. Attorney Eastern District, Virginia Mr. Dana J. Boente and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
John M. Dickson, Jr. v. FBI We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 15-2168
Plaintiff - Appellant: JOHN M. DICKSON, JR.
Defendant - Appellee: FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION, Newport News field office, John/Jane Doe (s) Supervisor Technical agent (s), Acting as a person (s) and member (s) of a criminal enterprise Under Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO), FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION, Newport News field office, John/Jane Doe (s) Technical agent (s), Acting as a person (s) and member (s) of a criminal enterprise Under Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO), FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION, Newport News field office, John/Jane Doe (s) Supervisor field agent (s), Acting as a person (s) and member (s) of a criminal enterprise Under Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO) and others
Dickson v. Federal Bureau of Investigation Newport News field office, John/Jane Doe (s) Supervisor Technical agent (s) et al
as 4:2015cv00092
Plaintiff: John M. Dickson, Jr.
Defendant: Federal Bureau of Investigation Newport News field office, John/Jane Doe (s) Supervisor Technical agent (s), Federal Bureau of Investigation Newport News field office, John/Jane Doe (s) Technical agent (s), Federal Bureau of Investigation Newport News field office, John/Jane Doe (s) Supervisor field agent (s) and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
Joyce Dalen et al v. Arnold H. Stubblefield et al
as 5:2015cv00796
Plaintiff: Stephen Allen, Joyce Dalen, Does and others
Defendant: Kyle Brodie, Marcio Carvalho, Brian Crowell and others
Washington v. City of Redmond Police Department et al
as 6:2015cv00583
Defendant: Bend Police, Redmond Police, Oregon State Patrols and Police Chiefs in Oregon, City of Bend, City of Bend Police Department and others
Plaintiff: Donnie Earl Washington
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1965 (RICO)
Daniel Wallace v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 15-1204
Plaintiff - Appellant: DANIEL P. WALLACE
Defendant - Appellee: JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE ASSOCIATION, ORLANS ASSOCIATES P.C. and others
Gambill v. Pierce County Superior Court and Clerk's Office et al
as 3:2015cv05077
Plaintiff: Bruce E. Gambill, Jr.
Defendant: Pierce County Superior Court and Clerk's Office, US Bankruptcy Court, US District Court and others
Cause Of Action: 00 U.S.C. § 0000
Moore v. Kagler et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2014cv00033
Plaintiff: Harry W. Moore
Defendant: Robert W. Kagler, Marshall County Commission, Hayhurst Company and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?