Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Cleveland Bakers and Teamsters Health & Welfare Fund v. Amag Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv12575
Plaintiff:
Cleveland Bakers and Teamsters Health & Welfare Fund
Defendant:
Amag Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and Covis Group S.a.r.l.
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
BCTGM Atlantic Health & Welfare Fund v. McKinsey & Company, Inc.
as 3:2022cv07348
Plaintiff:
BCTGM Atlantic Health & Welfare Fund
Defendant:
McKinsey & Company, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Cleveland Bakers & Teamsters Health & Welfare Fund v. Mckinsey & Company, Inc., et al
as 1:2021cv01218
Defendant:
McKinsey & Company, Inc. United States and Mckinsey & Company, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Cleveland Bakers & Teamsters Health & Welfare Fund
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
National Roofers Union & Employers Joint Health & Welfare Fund v. Purdue Pharma LP et al
as 1:2018op45833
Plaintiff:
National Roofers Union & Employers Joint Health & Welfare Fund
Defendant:
AmerisourceBergen Corporation, Endo Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Endo International plc and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
National Roofers Union & Employers Joint Health & Welfare Fund v. Purdue Pharma LP et al
as 2:2018cv01949
Plaintiff:
National Roofers Union & Employers Joint Health & Welfare Fund
Defendant:
Purdue Pharma LP, Cephalon Incorporated, Teva Pharmaceuticals Industries Limited and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
Central States, Southeast and Southwest Areas Health & Welfare Fund v. Purdue Pharma L.P. et al
as 1:2018op45623
Plaintiff:
Central States, Southeast and Southwest Areas Health & Welfare Fund
Defendant:
Purdue Pharma L.P., Cephalon, Inc., Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
SHEET METAL WORKERS LOCAL NO. 25 HEALTH & WELFARE FUND v. PURDUE PHARMA, LP et al
as 2:2017cv05079
Plaintiff:
SHEET METAL WORKERS LOCAL NO. 25 HEALTH & WELFARE FUND
Defendant:
PURDUE PHARMA, LP, PURDUE PHARMA INC., THE PURDUE FREDERICK COMPANY, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
New England Carpenters Health v. First DataBank, Inc., et al
as 09-2522
Plaintiff - Appellee:
CORINNA CONNICK, JUNE SWAN, MAUREEN COWIE and others
Interested Party - Appellant:
NATIONAL AUTOMATIC SPRINKLER INDUSTRY WELFARE FUND
Defendant - Appellee:
FIRST DATABANK, INC., a Missouri Corporation and MCKESSON CORPORATION, a Delaware Corporation
:
, , and others
New England Carpenters Health, et al v. First DataBank, Inc., et al
as 09-2380
Plaintiff - Appellee:
NEW ENGLAND CARPENTERS HEALTH BENEFITS FUND, PIRELLI ARMSTRONG RETIREE MEDICAL BENEFITS TRUST, PHILADELPHIA FEDERATION OF TEACHERS HEALTH AND WELFARE FUND and others
Interested Party - Appellant:
HEALTH MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATES, INC.
Petitioner - Appellee:
JUNE SWAN
Defendant - Appellee:
MCKESSON CORPORATION, a Delaware Corporation
Defendant:
FIRST DATABANK, INC., a Missouri Corporation
Interested Party:
AMERISOURCEBERGEN, BLUE CROSS BLUE SHIELD OF MICHIGAN, DEVILLE PHARMACIES, INC. and others
Amicus Curiae:
PHARMACEUTICAL CARE MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATION, INDEPENDENT PHARMACY COOPERATIVE and NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF CHAIN DRUG STORES, INC.
New England Carpenters Health, et al v. First DataBank, Inc., et al
as 09-2381
Plaintiff - Appellee:
NEW ENGLAND CARPENTERS HEALTH BENEFITS FUND, PIRELLI ARMSTRONG RETIREE MEDICAL BENEFITS TRUST, TEAMSTERS HEALTH & WELFARE FUND OF PHILADELPHIA AND VICINITY and others
Interested Party - Appellant:
NATIONAL AUTOMATIC SPRINKLER INDUSTRY WELFARE FUND
Defendant - Appellee:
MCKESSON CORPORATION, a Delaware Corporation
Defendant:
FIRST DATABANK, INC., a Missouri Corporation
Interested Party:
AMERISOURCEBERGEN, BLUE CROSS BLUE SHIELD OF MICHIGAN, DEVILLE PHARMACIES, INC. and others
Amicus Curiae:
PHARMACEUTICAL CARE MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATION, INDEPENDENT PHARMACY COOPERATIVE and NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF CHAIN DRUG STORES, INC.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
