Cases 1 - 6 of 6
Grant v. PETER WOLF & ASSOCIATES PC et al
as 9:2022cv04262
Plaintiff:
Terry Lennette Grant
Defendant:
PETER WOLF & ASSOCIATES PC, Peter Wolf, Esq, WOLF & MOGIL LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Wu v. Kallies et al
as 1:2019cv08388
Defendant:
Mr. Thomas Kallies, Southern Cross Resources Group, Inc., Jeffrey Pozen and others
Plaintiff:
Mr. Alan Wu
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
Pfeiffer v. Ajamie LLP et al
as 4:2019cv02760
Defendant:
Ajamie LLP, Mr. John W John, V, Mr. Thomas R Ajamie and others
Plaintiff:
Mr. Justin C Pfeiffer and Justin C Pfeiffer
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964
John M. Dickson, Jr. v. Judge Bryant L. Sugg
as 15-1852
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN M. DICKSON, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
JUDGE BRYANT LEE SUGG, Newport News Circuit Court 7th Judicial Court of Virginia As an "enterprise" for RICO purposes Acting as a person and member of a criminal enterprise Under the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act, FORMER JUDGE MR. HOWARD VINCENT CONWAY, JR., Of the Newport News Circuit Court Formerly of 7th Judicial Court of Virginia As an "enterprise" for RICO purposes Acting as a person and member of a criminal enterprise Under the Racketeer Influenced and Corrup, COMMONWEALTH'S ATTORNEY MR. THOMAS C. DANIEL, Commonwealth's Attorney's Office For the city of Newport News Acting as a person and member of a criminal enterprise Under the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO) and others
Dickson v. Sugg et al
as 4:2015cv00050
Plaintiff:
John M. Dickson, Jr.
Defendant:
Judge Bryant L. Sugg, Former Judge Mr. Howard Vincent Conway, Jr, Commonwealth's Attorney Mr. Thomas C. Daniel and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
HECKING v. NEW HAMPSHIRE CONJUNCTIVE PARTIES et al
as 1:2013cv00565
Defendant:
ATTY. MS. "PAT", MS. KELLY AYOTTE, MS. KATHRYN BARGER and others
Plaintiff:
CAPTAIN DIRCK HECKING
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
