Consumer Credit Cases matching "HOUSTON"
Cases 121 - 130 of 16,251
Stockton v. Reed et al
as 4:2024cv00365
Plaintiff: Joshua Stockton
Defendant: Marshal Reed, Aundrea Culclager, Joe Page, III and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Searles et al v. City of Houston et al
as 4:2024cv01534
Plaintiff: Mia Searles, Tiffany Rachal, Warren Randle and others
Defendant: CITY OF HOUSTON, Troy Finner, Shane C Privette and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv21553
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv01518
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Incorrectly Filed
as 4:2024cv01516
Plaintiff: Jose Alberto Gonzalez and Incorrectly Filed
Defendant: DIRECTOR USCIS UR MENDOZA JADDOU, SECRETARY ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, US ATTORNEY GENERAL MERRICK GARLAND and others
Cause Of Action: 88 U.S.C. § 8888 Other Statutory Actions
Houston Prime v. Community Loan
as 24-20171
Plaintiff: Houston Prime Investments, Limited
Defendant: Community Loan Servicing, L.L.C.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 9:2024bk13938
Debtor: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Us Trustee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Trustee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv01495
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2024cv14120
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv01460
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?