Cases 21 - 30 of 54
Jeh Johnson, et al v. Felix Lozano-Rodriguez
as 14-40739
Plaintiff - Appellee:
JEH CHARLES JOHNSON, SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., U. S. ATTORNEY GENERAL
Defendant - Appellant:
FELIX LOZANO-RODRIGUEZ
Rodriguez v. Oklahoma Attorney General
as 5:2014cv00407
Petitioner:
Samuel Rodriguez
Defendant:
Oklahoma Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Koch v. Thomas et al
as 3:2014cv05046
Petitioner:
Michael W Koch
Respondent:
J Thomas and US Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Julien Garcon v. State of Florida, et al
as 13-12463
Petitioner - Appellant:
JULIEN GARCON
Respondent - Appellee:
STATE OF FLORIDA, ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA, JANE DOE and others
Edgar Searcy v. USA, et al
as 13-11766
Petitioner - Appellant:
EDGAR JOE SEARCY
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL
v. Attorney General of Michigan et al
as 2:2013md00001
Respondent:
Attorney General of Michigan and Erick Balcarcel
Petitioner:
Alvin Davis
Garaventa v. Holder
as 13-1088
Petitioner - Appellant:
Bryan Garaventa
Respondent - Appellee:
Eric H. Holder, Jr., United States Attorney General et al
Davis v. State of Alaska
as 3:2013cv00018
Petitioner:
Michael Joseph Davis
Respondent:
State of Alaska and The Attorney General of the State of Alaska
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Demos v. The U.S. Secretary of Defense et al
as 1:2013cv00007
Petitioner:
John Robert Demos, Jr.
Respondent:
The U.S. Secretary of Defense, The U.S. Secretary of State and The U.S. Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Brown, Jr. v. Rhode Island Attorney General
as 1:2012cv00873
Petitioner:
Gerald M. Brown, Jr.
Respondent:
Rhode Island Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
