General Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 3,421
ALWARD v. MDOC et al
as 3:2024cv00792
Petitioner: Matthew Keith Alward and Matthew Keith Berry
Respondent: Mdoc, Washtenaw County Court and Wayne County Court
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Matthews v. Federal Medical Center Warden
as 4:2024cv00405
Petitioner: Eric Martin Matthews
Respondent: Federal Medical Center Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Samia v. Divris
as 4:2024cv40070
Petitioner: Elias A. Samia
Respondent: Matthew Divris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Matthew Milisits v. Superintendent Benner Township SCI, et al
as 24-1839
Plaintiff: MATTHEW CHRISTIAN MILISITS
Defendant: SUPERINTENDENT BENNER TOWNSHIP SCI, ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA and DISTRICT ATTORNEY WESTMORELAND COUNTY
Tassone v. D'Varga et al
as 2:2024cv02123
Plaintiff: Matthew Tassone
Defendant: Judge Jessica G D'Varga and Judge James Green
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
ALWARD v. ELKTON FSL et al
as 2:2024cv01888
Petitioner: MATTHEW KEITH ALWARD
Respondent: ELKTON FSL and BRIAN NEWELL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
ALWARD v. MDOC et al
as 2:2024cv01894
Petitioner: MATTHEW KEITH ALWARD and MATTHEW KEITH BERRY
Respondent: MDOC, WASHTENAW COUNTY and WAYNE COUNTY COURT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Libby v. Divris
as 24-1415
Petitioner: JEREMY LIBBY
Respondent: MATTHEW DIVRIS
Louis Clements v. Secretary, Department of Corrections
as 24-11353
Petitioner: LOUIS MATTHEW CLEMENTS
Respondent: SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Gardner v. Divris
as 4:2024cv40067
Petitioner: Robert Gardner
Respondent: Matthew Divris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?