Cases 11 - 20 of 339
Michael Peterson v. Harold Clarke
as 24-6179
Petitioner:
MICHAEL ANDREW PETERSON
Respondent:
HAROLD W. CLARKE
Burnett v. Heaton et al
as 5:2024cv03032
Petitioner:
Jason Wade Burnett
Respondent:
Ted Heaton, Paul Kitzke and Clint Peterson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Peterson v. State of Wyoming et al
as 2:2024cv00002
Petitioner:
Carl Peterson and Carl W Peterson
Respondent:
State of Wyoming, Wyoming Attorney General, Wyoming Governor and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
PETERSON v. THE PHILADELPHIA DISTRICT ATTORNEY et al
as 2:2023cv04832
Petitioner:
EDWARD C. PETERSON
Respondent:
THE PHILADELPHIA DISTRICT ATTORNEY and THE PENNSYLVANIA ATTORNEY GENERAL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Peterson v. Rokosky
as 1:2023cv00576
Petitioner:
Deshawn Peterson
Respondent:
Warden Rokosky
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Peterson v. Salmonsen et al
as 1:2023cv00085
Petitioner:
Timothy Edward Peterson
Respondent:
James Salmonsen and Attorney General of the State of Montana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Peterson v. Clarke
as 2:2023cv00346
Petitioner:
Michael Andrew Peterson
Respondent:
Harold W. Clarke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Peterson v. Clarke
as 7:2023cv00417
Petitioner:
Michael Andrew Peterson
Respondent:
Harold W. Clarke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Israel Peterson v. Florida Department of Corrections
as 23-12029
Petitioner / Appellant:
ISRAEL LAVERNE PETERSON
Defendant / Appellee:
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Peterson v. Brown
as 5:2023cv00112
Petitioner:
Terrance Markeith Peterson
Respondent:
Warden Brown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
