Cases 11 - 20 of 213
Castro-Rosa v. Ray
as 1:2023cv07242
Petitioner:
Jesus Manuel Castro-Rosa
Respondent:
Heather Ray
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 in Habeas Corpus: INS
Castro-Rosa v. Ray
as 3:2023cv00180
Petitioner:
Jesus Manuel Castro-Rosa
Respondent:
Heather Ray
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Serrano v. Lumpkin
as 23-50527
Petitioner / Appellant:
Rosa Serrano
Respondent / Appellee:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Rosas-Martinez v. Warden, FCI Beaumont Low
as 1:2023cv00287
Petitioner:
Roman Rosas-Martinez
Respondent:
Warden, FCI Beaumont Low
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Sumontinee Sridej v. Antony Blinken, et al
as 23-16021
Petitioner / Appellant:
SUMONTINEE SRIDEJ
Respondent / Appellee:
ANTONY J. BLINKEN, MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General, GARY SCHOFIELD and others
Lewis Sibomana v. Luis Rosa, Jr., et al
as 23-15942
Petitioner / Appellant:
LEWIS ABDUL KALIM SIBOMANA
Respondent / Appellee:
LUIS ROSA, Jr., Warden, Warden, NSDC and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Deleon-Cuervo v. Warden Neely et al
as 7:2023cv00787
Petitioner:
Rosa Nely Deleon-Cuervo
Respondent:
Warden Neely
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Kelvin Rosa v. Administrator East Jersey State Prison, et al
as 23-1757
Plaintiff / Appellee:
KELVIN ROSA
Defendant / Appellant:
ATTORNEY GENERAL NEW JERSEY and ADMINISTRATOR EAST JERSEY STATE PRISON
Rosas v. Derr
as 1:2023cv00176
Petitioner:
Liliana Rosas
Respondent:
Warden Estelle Derr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
PERKINS v. SANTA ROSA COUNTY FLORIDA
as 3:2023cv08011
Petitioner:
SEAN KRIS PERKINS
Respondent:
SANTA ROSA COUNTY FLORIDA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
