Cases 11 - 20 of 14,050
Romanik v. United States of America et al
as 8:2024cv01454
Petitioner:
Jerod John Romanik
Respondent:
United States of America, USPC Coleman and Keeton Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
O'Neil v. United States of America
as 5:2024hc02113
Petitioner:
David O'Neil
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
David MacLloyd v. USA
as 24-1505
Petitioner:
DAVID ERIKE MACLLOYD
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
YARBROUGH v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2024cv00304
Petitioner:
ANTWAINE ENTA YARBROUGH
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Martin, Moses M. v. United States Government
as 0:2024cv60991
Plaintiff:
Moses M Martin
Defendant:
United States Government
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Perez Sanchez v. United States of America
as 5:2024cv00287
Petitioner:
Ovidio Perez Sanchez
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Svoboda v. United States of America
as 9:2024cv00079
Petitioner:
Emily Ann Svoboda
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Hawkins v. United States of America
as 5:2024cv00135
Petitioner:
Ellis Earl Hawkins
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Dunlap v. The United States
as 3:2024cv01015
Petitioner:
Jermaine Joseph Dunlap
Respondent:
The United States
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hicks v. United States of America
as 5:2024cv00133
Petitioner:
Traylin Dashaun Hicks
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
