General Cases
Cases 21 - 30 of 68
SOUELS v. B.O.P. et al
as 1:2018cv00928
Petitioner: SEAN A. SOUELS
Respondent: B.O.P. and PERDUE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Bates v. Director of B.O.P.
as 1:2017cv23456
Defendant: Director of B.O.P.
Plaintiff: Avinie Maurice Bates, III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Nyenekor Sr. v. Baird et al
as 1:2015cv09455
Petitioner: Dr. Carpeah Rudolph Nyenekor Sr.
Respondent: Warden Maureen Baird and Director of Federal B.O.P
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Cox v. United States of America et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2015cv00392
Petitioner: Montarius Cox
Respondent: United States of America, Attorney General and B.O.P.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
WARREN v. UNITED STATES et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2015cv00590
Petitioner: Isaac D. Warren
Respondent: United States , B.O.P. and PA Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
WARREN v. UNITED STATES et al
as 2:2014cv06436
Petitioner: ISAAC D. WARREN
Respondent: UNITED STATES and B.O.P.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
PAGE v. SHARTLE et al
as 1:2014cv06880
Petitioner: STEPHEN MICHAEL PAGE
Respondent: SHARTLE , FEDERAL B.O.P. DIRECTOR , FIA F.C.I. CLINICAL DIRECTOR and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
WILLIAMS v. LARIVA et al
as 2:2014cv00093
Respondent: B.O.P., DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE and LEANNE LARIVA
Petitioner: RONALD EDWARD WILLIAMS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Wells v. B.O.P. et al
as 1:2014cv00500
Petitioner: Tyrone Wells
Respondent: B.O.P. and J.E. Krueger
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Dowty v. B.O.P. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2013cv03032
Petitioner: Earl David Dowty
Respondent: B.O.P., State of South Dakota and Marty Jackley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?