Cases 21 - 30 of 866
Rouse v. Hancock County Jail et al (PSLC2)
as 3:2023cv00108
Petitioner:
Martin Ray Rouse
Respondent:
Hancock County Jail and Brad Brewer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Carter v. Norman
as 3:2023cv00673
Plaintiff:
Joshua Lee Carter
Defendant:
Brad Norman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Leonard Sandoval v. Brad Cain
as 23-35213
Petitioner / Appellant:
LEONARD CONTRERAS SANDOVAL
Respondent / Appellee:
BRAD CAIN, Superintendent, Snake River Correctional Institution
Eric Russell v. Brad Cain
as 23-35210
Petitioner / Appellant:
ERIC DESHAUNTE RUSSELL
Respondent / Appellee:
BRAD CAIN
Deschaine v. Cain
as 2:2023cv00403
Petitioner:
Norman Dean Deschaine
Respondent:
Brad Cain
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Turner v. Cain et al
as 2:2023cv00268
Petitioner:
Daniel Turner
Respondent:
Brad Cain and Snake River Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Richard Salmon v. Brad Cain, et al
as 23-35137
Petitioner / Appellant:
RICHARD W. SALMON
Respondent / Appellee:
BRAD CAIN, Superintendent of Snake River Correctional Institution and OREGON BOARD OF PAROLE AND POST-PRISON SUPERVISION
Respondent:
MARK NOOTH, OREGON BOARD OF PAROLE and ELLEN F. ROSENBLUM, The Attorney General of the State
Cisneros v. Cain
as 2:2023cv00248
Petitioner:
William Cisneros
Respondent:
Brad Cain
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Freeland v. Mutter
as 5:2023cv00042
Petitioner:
Aron Freeland
Respondent:
R. S. Mutter and Brad Douglas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
McPherson v. Mutter
as 1:2023cv00057
Petitioner:
Wayne McPherson
Respondent:
Brad Douglas and R. S. Mutter
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
