Cases 21 - 30 of 31
Charles Scalf v. Rick Thaler, Director
as 10-40302
Petitioner - Appellant:
CHARLES ROBERT SCALF
Respondent - Appellee:
RICK THALER, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Barefoot v. Revell et al
as 5:2010hc02030
Petitioner:
Charles Robert Barefoot, Jr.
Respondent:
Sarah Revell and United States Of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Chapman v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 5:2009cv00539
Petitioner:
Charles Robert Chapman
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections and Florida Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Barefoot v. Revell et al
as 5:2009hc02091
Petitioner:
Charles Robert Barefoot, Jr.
Respondent:
Sarah Revell and Eric Holder
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Scalf v. Quarterman
as 6:2008cv00086
Petitioner:
Charles Robert Scalf
Respondent:
Nathaniel Quarterman
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Barefoot v. Holding et al
as 5:2008hc02179
Petitioner:
Charles Robert Barefoot, Jr.
Respondent:
George E.B. Holding and Eric David Goulian
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Charles Gorton v. James Tilton
as 08-56157
Petitioner - Appellant:
CHARLES ROBERT GORTON
Respondent - Appellee:
JAMES E. TILTON, Secretary of Corrections
Guffey v. McWilliams et al
as 2:2007cv02009
Petitioner:
Charles Robert Guffey
Respondent:
Carson McWilliams and Arizona State Prison Complex, Florence
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Charles Robert Gorton v. James Tilton
as 5:2007cv01019
Petitioner:
Charles Robert Gorton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Charles Robert Adams v. Ivan D Clay
as 2:2007cv05177
Petitioner:
Charles Robert Adams
Respondent:
Ivan D Clay
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
