Cases 21 - 30 of 598
Cimbollek v. State of South Carolina et al
as 6:2023cv01805
Petitioner:
Robert Murphy Cimbollek
Respondent:
State of South Carolina, County of Union and Director of Union County Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (County)
Medina v. Caley et al
as 1:2023cv01042
Petitioner:
Delano Medina
Respondent:
Jennifer Murphy, Colorado Parole Board, Eddie Caley and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 st - Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Murphy v. El Paso Co. (CO) Dist. 4 District Attorney
as 23-1128
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARCUS ALLEN MURPHY
Defendant / Appellee:
EL PASO CO. (CO) DIST. 4 DISTRICT ATTORNEY
Murphy v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 4:2023cv01436
Petitioner:
John Eldridge Murphy
Respondent:
Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Murphy v. Lumpkin
as 4:2023cv01385
Petitioner:
John Elridge Murphy
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
MURPHY v. RULE et al
as 2:2023cv00152
Petitioner:
JAMES PATRICK MURPHY
Respondent:
T. RULE and FCI TERRE HAUTE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Murphy v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 4:2023cv01055
Petitioner:
John Eldridge Murphy
Defendant:
Director TDCJ-CID
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Murphy v. Black
as 1:2023cv00581
Petitioner:
Allen Murphy
Respondent:
Warden Kenneth Black
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Murphy v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 2:2023cv00045
Petitioner:
John Eldridge Murphy
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Murphy v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 3:2023cv00515
Petitioner:
John Eldridge Murphy
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
