Cases 21 - 30 of 31
PROPHET-ABDUL HAKIYM JOAQUIN FOY EL-MEHDI, ET AL. v. PROPHET-JOAQUIN IRWIN FOY-AKA-AL-MAHDI et al
as 2:2010cv04052
Petitioner:
PROPHET-ABDUL HAKIYM JOAQUIN FOY EL-MEHDI, ET AL.
Respondent:
PROPHET-JOAQUIN IRWIN FOY-AKA-AL-MAHDI, HON.WARDEN-MARTY C. ANDERSON, HIS PSYCHE STAFF and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Joseph Prophet v. Ken Clark
as 09-17803
Petitioner - Appellant:
JOSEPH DANNY PROPHET
Respondent - Appellee:
KEN CLARK, Warden
Foy, Al-Mahdi of the United Nations Building in New York City, New York, 10017 v. Rice, M.D. et al
as 6:2009cv03085
Petitioner:
Prophet Joaquin Irwin Foy, Al-Mahdi of the United Nations Building in New York City, New York, 10017
Respondent:
Dr. Rice, M.D., Dr. Rice, M.D., Dr. Sarrazin, M.D. and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Prophet v. Clark
as 1:2008cv01546
Petitioner:
Joseph Danny Prophet
Respondent:
Ken Clark
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Prophet v. Clark
as 2:2008cv02507
Petitioner:
Joseph Danny Prophet
Respondent:
Ken Clark
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Prophet v. Quarterman
as 08-20626
Petitioner - Appellant:
THORNTON RAY PROPHET
Respondent - Appellee:
NATHANIEL QUARTERMAN, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Prophet v. Quarterman
as 4:2008cv01834
Petitioner:
Thornton Ray Prophet
Respondent:
Nathaniel Quarterman
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Prophet v. Clark
as 2:2007cv02391
Petitioner:
Joseph Danny Prophet
Respondent:
Ken Clark
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Prophet v. Clark
as 1:2007cv01598
Petitioner:
Joseph Danny Prophet
Respondent:
Ken Clark
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Prophet v. Director of Correction of California et al
as 2:2007cv00670
Petitioner:
Joseph Danny Prophet
Respondent:
Director of Correction of California and Attorney General of the State of California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
