Cases 21 - 30 of 22,014
Martin v. Breitenbach et al
as 3:2024cv00235
Petitioner:
William Martin
Respondent:
Nethanjah Breitenbach and The Attorney General of the State of Nevada
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Sanders v. Secretary, Department of Corrections (Putnam)
as 3:2024cv00591
Petitioner:
William Carl Sanders
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Williams v. Barwick
as 3:2024cv50218
Plaintiff:
Marvin Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(HC) Bond v. Sacramento County
as 2:2024cv01598
Petitioner:
William Anthony Bond
Respondent:
Sacramento County
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
MORRISON v. WASHINGTON
as 2:2024cv02531
Petitioner:
WILLIAM MORRISON
Respondent:
M WASHINGTON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Jones v. Director Department Corrections
as 1:2024cv00976
Petitioner:
Herbert William Jones, Jr.
Respondent:
Director Department Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Simmons v. Wickersham et al
as 1:2024cv11453
Petitioner:
LaTausha Simmons
Respondent:
Anthony Wickersham, Peter Lucido and William Dwyer
Olten v. Williams
as 2:2024cv04093
Petitioner:
Dale S Olten
Respondent:
Eric Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Hill v. Rankins et al
as 5:2024cv00564
Petitioner:
Patrick Henry Hill, II
Respondent:
William C Rankins and Attorney General of the State of Oklahoma
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Eugene William Hillman v. Warden
as 5:2024cv01175
Petitioner:
Eugene William Hillman
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
