Cases 31 - 40 of 71
WATSON v. CARVER
as 1:2018cv00241
Petitioner:
TRAVIS L. WATSON
Respondent:
MARK CARVER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
CARDENAS v. CARVER
as 1:2018cv00236
Petitioner:
DAVID CRUZ CARDENAS
Respondent:
MARK CARVER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Carver v. The Commonwealth Department of Corrections
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 1:2018cv00027
Petitioner:
Roy Anderson Carver, Jr.
Respondent:
The Commonwealth Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
WATSON v. CARVER
as 1:2018cv00123
Petitioner:
TRAVIS L. WATSON
Respondent:
MARK CARVER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
WATSON v. CARVER
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 1:2017cv01067
Petitioner:
TRAVIS LASHAUN WATSON
Respondent:
MARK CARVER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
John Hayes, III v. Mark Carver
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 17-7441
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN R. HAYES, III
Defendant - Appellee:
MARK CARVER
CARVER v. SUPERINTENDENT
as 1:2017cv02145
Petitioner:
JEFFREY CARVER
Respondent:
SUPERINTENDENT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Carver v. Strode et al
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 1:2017cv00109
Petitioner:
Roy Anderson Carver, Jr.
Respondent:
Jackie T. Strode and Steve Harmon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Roy Carver, Jr. v. Jackie Strode
as 16-6829
Petitioner - Appellant:
ROY ANDERSON CARVER, JR.
Respondent - Appellee:
JACKIE T. STRODE, Warren County Jailer
Carver v. Raemish et al
as 1:2016cv02679
Petitioner:
Readding L. Carver
Respondent:
Rick Raemish and Cynthia H. Coffman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.